Files
better-claude-config/README.md
T
BCC Agent 4836c6cb48
CI / Lint (ruff) (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI / Tests (py3.10 / ubuntu-latest) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / Tests (py3.12 / ubuntu-latest) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / Tests (py3.12 / windows-latest) (pull_request) Successful in 35s
CI / Tests (py3.13 / ubuntu-latest) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / Catalog signature (pull_request) Failing after 6s
chore(#68): rotate signing keys, key-rotation re-attestation mode, harden show-seed-b64
Wires the maintainer's freshly-rotated signing keys into BCC (issue #68
finding 5: the old key was shared between catalog+release and had been
exposed to CI), adds a key-rotation re-attestation mode to the Catalog
Console so the Console can actually re-sign under the new key, and
hardens the show-seed-b64 CLI prompt that led to a private key being
pasted into a chat.

## New keys (#68 finding 5)

- bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS -> new CATALOG pubkey
  (0s24PmkZcTT5yxNDdyTPHl5fyxArrHNPJKBjnXoQd8k=). Signs data/catalog.json,
  Console-only, offline.
- .github/workflows/ci.yml EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64 -> same new
  catalog pubkey (the CI trust anchor added for #68 finding 4).
- scripts/sign_checksums.py RELEASE_PUBKEYS -> new RELEASE pubkey
  (6BnPgJEHJFyVltFoLTCNadIsehjy00iiW8IRlC1TfhA=). Signs SHA256SUMS only,
  CI-resident.
- README.md 'Verifying your download' / 'Signing keys' sections filled in
  with both pubkeys, explicit about which key is which.

The old key 082NOwVB7uURkvfyS3+knJ+40Fk6C9unsF47+2uPKo4= is retired (it
was shared and exposed to CI) and is deliberately NOT retained in either
trust list -- keeping a burned key in CATALOG_PUBKEYS would defeat the
point of rotating it.

## Key-rotation re-attestation mode (Catalog Console)

Problem: after the key swap, the existing data/catalog.json.sig (signed
with the OLD key) no longer verifies under the NEW CATALOG_PUBKEYS, but
catalog content is unchanged, so diff_catalogs(last_signed, current) is
empty -- and can_sign()'s empty-diff guard (load-bearing, #68 finding 1)
correctly refuses to sign an empty changeset. Without a rotation-aware
path, the Console could never re-sign and CI would stay red forever.

Fix: treat rotation as a full re-attestation, not a diff.

- catalog_review.py: ReviewSession/start_review gain reattest: bool =
  False. When set, changes is built via diff_catalogs(None, new_catalog)
  -- every entry presented as if newly added, requiring a fresh
  acknowledgement -- instead of diffing against old_catalog. can_sign()
  is UNCHANGED: it still refuses a genuinely-empty changeset and still
  enforces the TOCTOU blob-SHA pin and the blocking-risk check, because
  reattest sessions simply never produce an empty changeset (unless the
  catalog itself is empty).
- catalog_console.py: adds catalog_signature_valid_at(repo_dir, commit,
  raw), which calls bcc_core.verify_catalog_signature directly (never
  reimplemented) to detect whether the committed .sig verifies under the
  CURRENT CATALOG_PUBKEYS. ReviewWindow._on_load's source=main path uses
  this to decide reattest=True/False, and shows a loud, explicit red
  banner ("KEY ROTATION IN PROGRESS...") whenever reattest mode is
  entered -- never silent. Status text and Sign-button gating flow
  through the same can_sign()/all_entries_acknowledged() path as normal
  review.
- tests/test_catalog_review.py: 6 new tests covering re-attest mode
  (one change-entry per server, gating until all acknowledged, then
  permits), confirming normal mode still refuses an empty diff (rotation
  path is not a general bypass), and confirming reattest mode still
  enforces the blocking-risk check and the TOCTOU pin.

## show-seed-b64 hardening (Task 3)

The maintainer ran show-seed-b64 --release, saw an ambiguous prompt,
and pasted the printed PRIVATE seed into a chat believing it was public.

- cmd_show_seed_b64: passphrase prompt is now explicit ("Passphrase for
  the release signing key (the one YOU chose when generating it)"). A
  loud three-line warning banner prints to STDERR immediately before the
  seed ("!!! PRIVATE KEY BELOW..."); the seed itself stays alone on
  STDOUT so piping into pbcopy or a CI secret field still works cleanly.
- cmd_keygen: labels for both key kinds now say PUBLIC/PRIVATE explicitly
  and state safety properties inline (safe to commit vs. never commit),
  so the printed output can't be mistaken for the other key's.

## Verification

- ruff check . / ruff format --check .: clean.
- pytest: full suite green (360 passed, 1 skipped).
- Delete-the-check-and-watch-it-fail: each of can_sign()'s four gates
  (empty-diff, TOCTOU pin, blocking-risk, acknowledge-all) and the
  reattest branch itself were individually removed and confirmed to turn
  a test red, then restored -- see PR description for the exact
  failures.

Not touched: data/catalog.json (content-signed, maintainer's job via the
Console). No private key generated, requested, or committed. bcc.py
untouched (open PR #67).
2026-07-13 12:24:28 -04:00

236 lines
11 KiB
Markdown

# Better Claude Config (BCC)
A small, cross-platform GUI for editing the `mcpServers` block of Claude Desktop
and Claude Code installs — without ever hand-writing JSON.
BCC only ever touches `mcpServers` (and its own `_disabledMcpServers` parking
key). Every other key in your config is preserved verbatim, in its original
order. Each write is atomic and makes a timestamped backup first.
## Download (no Python required)
Pre-built self-contained binaries are attached to every [GitHub Release](../../releases):
| Platform | Download | Run |
|----------|----------|-----|
| macOS | `BetterClaudeConfig-macOS.zip` | Unzip → drag **BetterClaudeConfig.app** to Applications |
| Windows | `BetterClaudeConfig-Windows.zip` | Unzip → double-click **BetterClaudeConfig.exe** |
| Linux | `BetterClaudeConfig-Linux.tar.gz` | Extract → run **BetterClaudeConfig** |
> **macOS Gatekeeper note:** the app is not notarized. On first launch, right-click → **Open**, or run `xattr -cr /Applications/BetterClaudeConfig.app` in a terminal.
## Verifying your download
BCC isn't code-signed — there's no budget for a paid certificate (macOS
Developer ID, Windows Authenticode). Instead, every release publishes a
`SHA256SUMS` file listing the checksum of each archive, detached-signed with
Ed25519 as `SHA256SUMS.sig`. Both are attached to the release alongside the
binaries.
**What this proves:** the file you downloaded is byte-for-byte what we
published, and the manifest itself was signed by our release key.
**What this does NOT do:** it does not make the binary "safe," and it does
**not** remove the macOS Gatekeeper or Windows SmartScreen warning — those
are only suppressed by a paid OS-vendor certificate, which this project
doesn't have. Verifying checksums is about detecting tampering in transit or
on a mirror, not about vouching for the software.
This manifest is signed with BCC's **release key**, which is a different
key from the one that signs the MCP server catalog — see
[Signing keys](#signing-keys) below for why, and for the public key value
to use with `--pubkey-b64` below.
### macOS / Linux
```bash
# From inside the folder you downloaded the release files into:
sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS
```
If your `sha256sum` complains about missing files, download `SHA256SUMS`
into the same directory as the archive you downloaded — it lists every
platform's archive, and only the one(s) present will be checked.
To also verify the manifest's signature (optional, requires Python +
`pip install cryptography` and a checkout of this repo):
```bash
python3 scripts/sign_checksums.py verify \
--sums SHA256SUMS --sig SHA256SUMS.sig \
--pubkey-b64 "<the release public key from Signing keys, below>"
```
### Windows (PowerShell)
```powershell
Get-FileHash .\BetterClaudeConfig-Windows.zip -Algorithm SHA256
```
Compare the printed hash (case-insensitively) against the matching line in
`SHA256SUMS`.
### If a release has no `SHA256SUMS.sig`
The signing key is a repo secret that has to be configured manually; if a
release is missing the `.sig` file, the checksums themselves are still
valid and safe to check against — the release workflow only skips signing,
never checksum generation.
## Signing keys
BCC uses **two separate Ed25519 keypairs**, deliberately never the same
key, because they protect different things and live in different places:
| | Catalog key | Release key |
|---|---|---|
| Signs | `data/catalog.json` (the MCP server catalog every user's app trusts) | `SHA256SUMS` (the checksum manifest for release binaries) |
| Verified by | `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS` | `scripts/sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS` |
| Lives | Offline, passphrase-encrypted, maintainer's machine only (OS keychain or an encrypted file outside the repo — see the [Catalog Console](#files), issue #62) | A Gitea Actions repo secret, `RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY`**intentionally CI-resident** |
| Generated with | `python catalog_console.py keygen` | `python catalog_console.py keygen --release` |
| Exported for CI with | *(never — there is no supported way to export this key)* | `python catalog_console.py show-seed-b64 --release` |
**Why two keys:** the catalog key is the root of trust for what BCC
actually *executes* on a user's machine — every `command`/`args` pair in
the shipped catalog is only there because this key signed it. If that key
and the release-checksum key were the same (as they briefly were — see
[issue #68](../../issues/68)), then anything that can exfiltrate a Gitea
Actions secret (a malicious workflow-file PR, a compromised runner, a leaky
log) could sign a catalog every user's copy of BCC would trust, not just a
checksum manifest. Splitting them means **a CI/secret compromise burns the
release key, never the catalog key** — checksums for a future release could
be forged, which is bad, but no attacker gains the ability to make BCC run
arbitrary commands on installs that trust the catalog. That asymmetry is
the entire point of having two keys instead of one.
The catalog key is **never** meant to leave the maintainer's machine: it's
generated, stored, unlocked, and used to sign entirely inside the Catalog
Console (`catalog_console.py`), and `catalog_console.py show-seed-b64`
refuses to run without `--release` specifically so the catalog seed can't
be exported by habit or muscle memory.
**Release signing public key** (Ed25519, base64, raw 32 bytes) — this is
the RELEASE key, which signs `SHA256SUMS` (release checksums). It does
**not** sign `data/catalog.json` and is not the key `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS`
trusts:
```
6BnPgJEHJFyVltFoLTCNadIsehjy00iiW8IRlC1TfhA=
```
The catalog public key (Ed25519, base64, raw 32 bytes) — this is the key
that signs `data/catalog.json` and is trusted via `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS`
and the CI trust anchor in `.github/workflows/ci.yml`. It is listed here
for completeness, not because you need it to verify a download — use the
*release* key above for that:
```
0s24PmkZcTT5yxNDdyTPHl5fyxArrHNPJKBjnXoQd8k=
```
Both keys above were rotated 2026-07 — see [issue #68](../../issues/68)
finding 5. The prior (shared) key is retired and is deliberately **not**
kept in either trust list; retaining a burned key would defeat the point
of rotating it.
## Run from source
```bash
pip install -r requirements.txt
python bcc.py
```
(Python 3.10+, PySide6 6.6+.)
## What it does
- **Auto-discovers installs** — scans the platform's app-support folder for any
`Claude*` directory (so `Claude` and `Claude-Work` both show up) **and** finds
Claude Code's user-scope config at `~/.claude.json` (the file `claude mcp add`
writes). Use **Add config…** to point at any other file manually — e.g. a
project's `.mcp.json`.
- **Form-based editing** — name, command, args (one per line), env vars, or for
remote servers: URL, transport, and headers. No raw JSON.
- **Paste JSON — even broken JSON** — drop in any snippet from an MCP doc (full
`mcpServers` block, inner map, or a single bare server object); it's parsed
and merged. The paste box parses as you type and auto-repairs the stuff docs
and chat windows love to break: markdown fences, surrounding prose, comments,
trailing or missing commas, smart quotes, single quotes, unquoted keys, and
unclosed braces — and tells you exactly what it fixed before you commit.
- **Drag & drop** a `.json` file onto the window to import servers from it.
- **Copy to ▸** — copy the selected server straight into your *other* install.
- **Active / Disabled sections** — servers are shown in two labelled lists with
live counts, so a server that's switched off in the config is obvious at a
glance. Toggle a server's checkbox to move it between sections (disabled
servers are parked under `_disabledMcpServers`, which Claude ignores).
- **Dependency check + diagnostics** — each server shows whether its `command`
is actually found on PATH:
- ● green — found on the normal PATH; will work anywhere.
- ▲ amber (**PATH-risk**) — found, but *only* in a location BCC added on top of
the inherited PATH. It'll work when you launch Claude from a terminal, but a
double-clicked `.app` may not see it. This is the usual cause of "the tool
says it's fine but Claude won't start the server." One click on **Use full
path ↳** rewrites the bare command (`npx`) to its absolute path so any launch
finds it.
- ● red (**broken**) — not found anywhere.
- ◆ blue — remote (url) server. **Test connection** does a live reachability
check on a background thread (any HTTP response = reachable).
Each section header shows a **broken / PATH-risk count badge**, and selecting a
flagged server auto-opens a **Details** panel with a full, copy-pasteable
report: which command resolved to what, tailored install hints, and the exact
PATH that was searched (with `+` marking the dirs BCC added). **Re-check**
re-scans PATH after you install something; **Copy diagnostics** grabs the whole
report for a bug report.
After saving, **restart that Claude install** for changes to take effect.
## Config locations it scans
**Claude Desktop**
| OS | Base it scans for `Claude*` |
|---------|----------------------------------|
| macOS | `~/Library/Application Support` |
| Windows | `%APPDATA%` |
| Linux | `~/.config` |
**Claude Code** (all platforms): `~/.claude.json` (user scope). If servers are
found parked in `~/.claude/settings.json` — where Claude Code ignores them — that
file is also listed, marked *legacy*, so you can copy them over.
## Files
- `bcc.py` — the GUI.
- `bcc_core.py` — all the file/JSON/validation/dependency logic (no GUI deps).
- `test_core.py` — unit suite for the core (`python test_core.py`).
- `bcc.spec` — PyInstaller build spec (cross-platform).
- `scripts/build_icons.py` — regenerates `icons/app.icns` and `icons/app.ico` from source PNGs.
- `scripts/sign_checksums.py` — generates and Ed25519-signs the release `SHA256SUMS` manifest (see [Verifying your download](#verifying-your-download)).
- `catalog_console.py` / `catalog_review.py`**maintainer-only**, never shipped to users (excluded from `bcc.spec`; see `tests/test_catalog_console_packaging.py`). The Catalog Console: review + sign `data/catalog.json`, and generate/manage both signing keys (`keygen`, `keygen --release`) — see [Signing keys](#signing-keys).
## Building from source
```bash
pip install -r requirements-dev.txt
python scripts/build_icons.py # regenerate icons if needed
pyinstaller bcc.spec
# macOS → dist/BetterClaudeConfig.app
# Windows → dist/BetterClaudeConfig.exe
# Linux → dist/BetterClaudeConfig
```
Releases are built automatically by GitHub Actions (`.github/workflows/release.yml`) when a version tag is pushed:
```bash
git tag v1.0.0 && git push --tags
```
## Rebrand
The accent color is one constant (`ACCENT`) at the top of `bcc.py`.
## License
MIT — see [LICENSE](LICENSE).