feat(catalog-console): a keys status command, and complete rotation without a red main (#62, #68)

Two problems from issue #68's follow-up review:

1. The maintainer -- the only person who will ever use this tool -- cannot
   reliably tell which of the two signing keys is which or what state
   either is in. He already pasted a private key into a chat window
   because a prompt was ambiguous. That's a defect in this tool, not user
   error.

2. PR #71 rotates bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS, which makes
   data/catalog.json.sig (signed by the retired key) stop verifying and
   the CI catalog-signature job go red. The Console could previously only
   load/sign against `main`, so the only way through was to merge a red
   PR and fix main afterwards -- normalizing exactly the alarm fatigue
   this whole design exists to prevent.

Task 1 -- `python catalog_console.py keys`:
  A plain-English-first status report for BOTH keys: purpose, where the
  private half lives, whether it exists locally, its fingerprint, whether
  that fingerprint matches every place its public half is expected to be
  committed (bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS, ci.yml's trust anchor, and
  scripts/sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS -- checked independently, since
  issue #68 finding 4 was exactly bcc_core.py and ci.yml silently
  drifting apart), and whether data/catalog.json.sig currently verifies --
  ending with the exact command to run next. Needs no passphrase and never
  touches private key bytes: a plaintext public-key cache
  (store_public_key/load_public_key) is written alongside the existing
  encrypted private blob at keygen time, precisely so this command can
  report a fingerprint without decrypting anything.

  The status/report logic (key_status, render_key_status_report,
  recommend_next_steps, fingerprint_pubkey, extract_pubkey_list_literal,
  extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey) is pure and lives in catalog_review.py;
  cmd_keys in catalog_console.py is a thin printer over it, per the
  project's existing pure-core/thin-GUI split.

Task 2 -- rotation completable without a red main:
  ReviewWindow now offers a "current branch" source (auto-detected via
  `current_branch()`, or --ref to name one explicitly) alongside "main"
  and open PRs. Loading it runs the exact same diff-against-last-signed /
  rotation-detection logic "main" always used (_load_own_ref, extracted
  from the old hardcoded-to-main _on_load), just parameterized on the
  ref. Signing now pushes to session.loaded_ref, never a hardcoded "main"
  (commit_and_push_signed_catalog's branch param was already there --
  only the call site was wrong). The ref-list computation itself is a
  pure function (compute_own_refs) so this seam is unit-testable without
  git or Qt. None of can_sign()'s guards (empty-diff, acknowledge-all,
  blocking-risk, TOCTOU) were touched.

  This lets a rotation branch be reviewed, re-attested (every entry,
  since the new key never vouched for any of them -- issue #68 finding 5
  follow-up), signed, and pushed to ITS OWN branch before it's ever
  merged.

Task 3 -- label the keys everywhere:
  PassphraseDialog now shows which key (CATALOG vs RELEASE) and its
  fingerprint before the passphrase field, both in its window title and
  its prompt text -- the exact ambiguity that led to a private key being
  pasted into a chat window. cmd_keygen's stored-key confirmation now
  reads "CATALOG private key encrypted..." / "RELEASE private key
  encrypted..." instead of a capitalized-lowercase kind. The reattest
  banner now says "CATALOG signing key" / "CATALOG key" throughout
  instead of "the key".

PySide6's import is now guarded (try/except -> _PYSIDE6_AVAILABLE) and
every GUI class definition that depends on it moved under
`if _PYSIDE6_AVAILABLE:`. `keygen`, `show-seed-b64`, and the new `keys`
command have no GUI dependency and now work (and are testable) in an
environment without PySide6 -- which is exactly this repo's own `test`
CI job (pytest + cryptography only, no PySide6). `gui` fails with a clear
message instead of an ImportError stack trace if it's missing.

Tests: 26 new pure-function tests in tests/test_catalog_review.py
(fingerprint_pubkey, extract_pubkey_list_literal,
extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey, key_status, recommend_next_steps,
render_key_status_report) and a new tests/test_catalog_console_git.py
(14 tests) covering compute_own_refs, current_branch,
commit_and_push_signed_catalog's branch targeting, and
catalog_sig_status_on_disk against real local git repos -- importing
catalog_console.py directly, proving it works without PySide6. 400
passed, 1 skipped (pre-existing). ruff check / ruff format --check clean.

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -68,3 +68,109 @@ jobs:
 
       - name: Run tests
         run: python -m pytest -v
+
+  # ── Catalog signature gate (#61) ─────────────────────────────────────────
+  #
+  # data/catalog.json is a list of command+args entries that BCC writes into
+  # the user's Claude config, which Claude then EXECUTES. The catalog is only
+  # trusted if it carries a valid Ed25519 signature from the maintainer key.
+  #
+  # The threat this gate exists for is NOT an outsider pushing to the repo —
+  # it is the maintainer merging a friendly-looking PR without really reading
+  # it. A contributor can change catalog.json but cannot produce a matching
+  # signature, so a blindly-merged PR lands here as a RED BUILD within a
+  # minute, instead of quietly riding into the next release.
+  #
+  # Public-key verification only. No secret is used or needed.
+  catalog-signature:
+    name: Catalog signature
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: "3.12"
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: pip install cryptography
+
+      # 🔴 TRUST ANCHOR — issue #68 finding 4.
+      #
+      # This step used to do `import bcc_core as c` FROM THE CHECKED-OUT PR
+      # BRANCH and verify the catalog against c.CATALOG_PUBKEYS — i.e. it
+      # trusted the public key shipped in the very diff it was reviewing. A
+      # PR that changed data/catalog.json AND bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS (to
+      # an attacker key, with a matching signature produced by the attacker's
+      # matching private key) went green, because there was nothing outside
+      # the PR's own content to check the key against. The gate's whole
+      # point is catching a friendly-looking PR the maintainer merges
+      # without really reading it — and that hole made it a two-file diff.
+      #
+      # EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64 below is hardcoded HERE, in the workflow
+      # file, independent of whatever bcc_core.py says on the PR branch. It
+      # is intentionally the only line in this step that matters for
+      # security review: changing it changes what this gate is willing to
+      # trust. THIS CONSTANT IS A TRUST ANCHOR. A PR that changes this line
+      # in the same diff as a catalog change is exactly the attack this gate
+      # exists to prevent — review a change to this line on its own,
+      # never bundled with a catalog update.
+      #
+      # NOTE for the next key rotation: update EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64
+      # below to the new key's base64 form, as its own reviewed change.
+      - name: Verify data/catalog.json.sig
+        env:
+          EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64: "0s24PmkZcTT5yxNDdyTPHl5fyxArrHNPJKBjnXoQd8k="
+        run: |
+          python - <<'PY'
+          import base64, os, pathlib, sys
+          import bcc_core as c
+
+          expected_pubkey_b64 = os.environ["EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64"]
+
+          raw = pathlib.Path("data/catalog.json").read_bytes()
+          sig_path = pathlib.Path("data/catalog.json.sig")
+
+          if not sig_path.exists():
+              sys.exit("FAIL: data/catalog.json.sig is missing. The catalog must be "
+                       "signed via the Catalog Console (#62) before it can land.")
+
+          if b"\x00" * 32 in c.CATALOG_PUBKEYS:
+              sys.exit("FAIL: CATALOG_PUBKEYS still holds the placeholder key.")
+
+          # Trust anchor check FIRST, before verifying anything against
+          # bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS: a PR is not allowed to bring its own
+          # key. CATALOG_PUBKEYS on the checked-out branch must be EXACTLY
+          # the key(s) this workflow file itself expects -- no more, no
+          # fewer, no substitutions.
+          actual_pubkeys_b64 = [base64.b64encode(k).decode() for k in c.CATALOG_PUBKEYS]
+          if actual_pubkeys_b64 != [expected_pubkey_b64]:
+              sys.exit(
+                  "FAIL: bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS on this branch does not match the "
+                  "trust anchor hardcoded in .github/workflows/ci.yml.\n"
+                  f"  expected: {[expected_pubkey_b64]}\n"
+                  f"  actual:   {actual_pubkeys_b64}\n"
+                  "\n"
+                  "This PR is changing (or has changed) the catalog signing key. That "
+                  "change must be reviewed on its own, separately from any catalog "
+                  "content change, and the workflow's EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64 "
+                  "updated deliberately -- not accepted because it happened to match "
+                  "whatever bcc_core.py says on this branch."
+              )
+
+          if not c.verify_catalog_signature(raw, sig_path.read_bytes(), c.CATALOG_PUBKEYS):
+              sys.exit(
+                  "FAIL: data/catalog.json does NOT match its signature.\n"
+                  "\n"
+                  "The catalog changed without being re-signed. Either someone edited\n"
+                  "it directly (a PR you merged?), or a signing pass was forgotten.\n"
+                  "Re-review and re-sign with the Catalog Console — do not bypass this."
+              )
+
+          problems = c.validate_catalog(c.load_catalog(raw))
+          if problems:
+              sys.exit("FAIL: catalog failed validation:\n  " + "\n  ".join(problems))
+
+          print("OK: catalog signature verifies, the pubkey matches the CI trust anchor, "
+                "and the catalog validates clean.")
+          PY

.github/workflows/release.yml

@@ -95,6 +95,92 @@ jobs:
           name: ${{ matrix.artifact }}
           path: ${{ matrix.artifact }}
 
+  # ── Signing-key smoke test (workflow_dispatch only) ─────────────────────
+  #
+  # The Publish job is gated on a tag, so a manual run never exercises the
+  # signing step — which means a wrong/missing RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY secret
+  # would only be discovered at the worst possible moment: during a real
+  # release. This job signs a throwaway manifest with the secret and verifies
+  # the result against scripts/sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS.
+  #
+  # IMPORTANT (issue #68 finding 5): this must verify against the RELEASE
+  # public key, never bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS. The catalog key is the
+  # offline, maintainer-held root of trust for what BCC executes; it must
+  # NEVER be compared against a value that lives in a CI secret, because
+  # that comparison is itself a way to smuggle a catalog-trusted key through
+  # CI review ("does this repo secret match the catalog key" is a question
+  # this workflow must never even ask). The release key is a SEPARATE
+  # keypair, generated via `catalog_console.py keygen --release`, that only
+  # ever signs release SHA256SUMS manifests -- a CI/secret compromise burns
+  # this key, not the catalog key.
+  #
+  # It proves the two halves of the RELEASE keypair actually match, without
+  # publishing anything. Run it from the Actions tab after setting or
+  # rotating the secret.
+  signing-smoke-test:
+    name: Signing key smoke test
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
+    steps:
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+
+      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
+        with:
+          python-version: "3.12"
+
+      - name: Install dependencies
+        run: pip install cryptography
+
+      - name: Sign a throwaway manifest and verify against the RELEASE pubkey
+        env:
+          RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY: ${{ secrets.RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY }}
+        run: |
+          if [ -z "$RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY" ]; then
+            echo "FAIL: RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY secret is not set."
+            echo "Generate the RELEASE key (NOT the catalog key) with:"
+            echo "    python catalog_console.py keygen --release"
+            echo "then add its seed under Settings -> Actions -> Secrets, via:"
+            echo "    python catalog_console.py show-seed-b64 --release"
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          mkdir -p smoke && echo "smoke test payload" > smoke/hello.txt
+          python3 scripts/sign_checksums.py generate smoke --out smoke/SHA256SUMS
+          python3 scripts/sign_checksums.py sign --sums smoke/SHA256SUMS --out smoke/SHA256SUMS.sig
+          python - <<'PY'
+          import pathlib, sys
+          from scripts.sign_checksums import RELEASE_PUBKEYS, verify_checksums_against_any
+
+          # Deliberately does NOT import bcc_core / CATALOG_PUBKEYS at all --
+          # this smoke test must never be able to compare the CI secret
+          # against the catalog's root of trust (issue #68 finding 5). Only
+          # RELEASE_PUBKEYS (scripts/sign_checksums.py) is a legitimate
+          # target for a CI-resident key.
+          if not RELEASE_PUBKEYS:
+              sys.exit(
+                  "FAIL: scripts/sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS is empty.\n"
+                  "\n"
+                  "Generate the release keypair with:\n"
+                  "    python catalog_console.py keygen --release\n"
+                  "then paste the printed public key into RELEASE_PUBKEYS in\n"
+                  "scripts/sign_checksums.py and commit that change."
+              )
+
+          sums = pathlib.Path("smoke/SHA256SUMS").read_text()
+          sig = pathlib.Path("smoke/SHA256SUMS.sig").read_bytes()
+
+          if not verify_checksums_against_any(RELEASE_PUBKEYS, sums, sig):
+              sys.exit(
+                  "FAIL: the signature produced by RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY does NOT verify\n"
+                  "against any key in scripts/sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS.\n"
+                  "\n"
+                  "The secret and the shipped release public key are different keypairs.\n"
+                  "Downloaders would reject every signature this CI produces. Re-copy the\n"
+                  "seed from `catalog_console.py show-seed-b64 --release`, or update\n"
+                  "RELEASE_PUBKEYS with the matching public key."
+              )
+          print("OK: RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY matches a key in RELEASE_PUBKEYS.")
+          PY
+
   # ── Create GitHub Release with all three artifacts ──────────────────────
 
   release:
@@ -143,9 +229,13 @@ jobs:
       # checks. It does NOT remove Gatekeeper/SmartScreen warnings.
       #
       # The private key is a repo secret (RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY, base64 raw
-      # Ed25519 seed) generated via the Catalog Console (#62). If it's not
+      # Ed25519 seed) for the RELEASE key -- a SEPARATE keypair from the
-      # set, we still publish the release — just without a .sig — rather
+      # catalog key, generated via `python catalog_console.py keygen
-      # than fail the release outright.
+      # --release` (issue #68 finding 5; #62). This key is intentionally
+      # CI-resident and signs ONLY this checksum manifest; it is never
+      # trusted to sign data/catalog.json. If it's not set, we still
+      # publish the release — just without a .sig — rather than fail the
+      # release outright.
       - name: Check for signing key
         id: signing
         run: |
@@ -171,7 +261,7 @@ jobs:
       - name: Warn — release will be unsigned
         if: steps.signing.outputs.has_key != 'true'
         run: |
-          echo "::warning::RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY secret is not set — this release is being published WITHOUT a signed SHA256SUMS.sig. Add the secret (base64 raw Ed25519 seed, generated via the Catalog Console, #62) before the next tag."
+          echo "::warning::RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY secret is not set — this release is being published WITHOUT a signed SHA256SUMS.sig. Generate the RELEASE key (python catalog_console.py keygen --release) and add its seed (python catalog_console.py show-seed-b64 --release) as this secret before the next tag."
 
       - name: Create GitHub Release
         uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v2

README.md

@@ -36,11 +36,10 @@ are only suppressed by a paid OS-vendor certificate, which this project
 doesn't have. Verifying checksums is about detecting tampering in transit or
 on a mirror, not about vouching for the software.
 
-**Release signing public key** (Ed25519, base64, raw 32 bytes):
+This manifest is signed with BCC's **release key**, which is a different
-
+key from the one that signs the MCP server catalog — see
-```
+[Signing keys](#signing-keys) below for why, and for the public key value
-<PLACEHOLDER — AJ: paste the public key from the Catalog Console (#62) here>
+to use with `--pubkey-b64` below.
-```
 
 ### macOS / Linux
 
@@ -59,7 +58,7 @@ To also verify the manifest's signature (optional, requires Python +
 ```bash
 python3 scripts/sign_checksums.py verify \
   --sums SHA256SUMS --sig SHA256SUMS.sig \
-  --pubkey-b64 "<the public key above>"
+  --pubkey-b64 "<the release public key from Signing keys, below>"
 ```
 
 ### Windows (PowerShell)
@@ -78,6 +77,77 @@ release is missing the `.sig` file, the checksums themselves are still
 valid and safe to check against — the release workflow only skips signing,
 never checksum generation.
 
+## Signing keys
+
+BCC uses **two separate Ed25519 keypairs**, deliberately never the same
+key, because they protect different things and live in different places:
+
+| | Catalog key | Release key |
+|---|---|---|
+| Signs | `data/catalog.json` (the MCP server catalog every user's app trusts) | `SHA256SUMS` (the checksum manifest for release binaries) |
+| Verified by | `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS` | `scripts/sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS` |
+| Lives | Offline, passphrase-encrypted, maintainer's machine only (OS keychain or an encrypted file outside the repo — see the [Catalog Console](#files), issue #62) | A Gitea Actions repo secret, `RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY` — **intentionally CI-resident** |
+| Generated with | `python catalog_console.py keygen` | `python catalog_console.py keygen --release` |
+| Exported for CI with | *(never — there is no supported way to export this key)* | `python catalog_console.py show-seed-b64 --release` |
+
+**Confused about which key is which, or what state either is in?** Run:
+
+```bash
+python catalog_console.py keys
+```
+
+It needs no passphrase (it never touches private key bytes) and prints a
+plain-English report for both keys: where each private half lives, whether
+it's present on this machine, its fingerprint, whether that fingerprint
+matches what's actually committed in `bcc_core.py`, `ci.yml`'s trust
+anchor, and `scripts/sign_checksums.py`, and whether
+`data/catalog.json.sig` currently verifies — ending with the exact command
+to run next for whatever state it finds. This is the check that would have
+caught [issue #68](../../issues/68)'s finding 5 incident before it happened.
+
+**Why two keys:** the catalog key is the root of trust for what BCC
+actually *executes* on a user's machine — every `command`/`args` pair in
+the shipped catalog is only there because this key signed it. If that key
+and the release-checksum key were the same (as they briefly were — see
+[issue #68](../../issues/68)), then anything that can exfiltrate a Gitea
+Actions secret (a malicious workflow-file PR, a compromised runner, a leaky
+log) could sign a catalog every user's copy of BCC would trust, not just a
+checksum manifest. Splitting them means **a CI/secret compromise burns the
+release key, never the catalog key** — checksums for a future release could
+be forged, which is bad, but no attacker gains the ability to make BCC run
+arbitrary commands on installs that trust the catalog. That asymmetry is
+the entire point of having two keys instead of one.
+
+The catalog key is **never** meant to leave the maintainer's machine: it's
+generated, stored, unlocked, and used to sign entirely inside the Catalog
+Console (`catalog_console.py`), and `catalog_console.py show-seed-b64`
+refuses to run without `--release` specifically so the catalog seed can't
+be exported by habit or muscle memory.
+
+**Release signing public key** (Ed25519, base64, raw 32 bytes) — this is
+the RELEASE key, which signs `SHA256SUMS` (release checksums). It does
+**not** sign `data/catalog.json` and is not the key `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS`
+trusts:
+
+```
+6BnPgJEHJFyVltFoLTCNadIsehjy00iiW8IRlC1TfhA=
+```
+
+The catalog public key (Ed25519, base64, raw 32 bytes) — this is the key
+that signs `data/catalog.json` and is trusted via `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS`
+and the CI trust anchor in `.github/workflows/ci.yml`. It is listed here
+for completeness, not because you need it to verify a download — use the
+*release* key above for that:
+
+```
+0s24PmkZcTT5yxNDdyTPHl5fyxArrHNPJKBjnXoQd8k=
+```
+
+Both keys above were rotated 2026-07 — see [issue #68](../../issues/68)
+finding 5. The prior (shared) key is retired and is deliberately **not**
+kept in either trust list; retaining a burned key would defeat the point
+of rotating it.
+
 ## Run from source
 
 ```bash
@@ -152,6 +222,7 @@ file is also listed, marked *legacy*, so you can copy them over.
 - `bcc.spec` — PyInstaller build spec (cross-platform).
 - `scripts/build_icons.py` — regenerates `icons/app.icns` and `icons/app.ico` from source PNGs.
 - `scripts/sign_checksums.py` — generates and Ed25519-signs the release `SHA256SUMS` manifest (see [Verifying your download](#verifying-your-download)).
+- `catalog_console.py` / `catalog_review.py` — **maintainer-only**, never shipped to users (excluded from `bcc.spec`; see `tests/test_catalog_console_packaging.py`). The Catalog Console: review + sign `data/catalog.json` (against `main`, an open PR, or the branch you have checked out — `--ref <branch>` to be explicit, e.g. mid key-rotation, so a rotation can be signed and pushed to its own branch *before* it's merged, never forcing a red `main`), generate/manage both signing keys (`keygen`, `keygen --release`), and report on their status (`keys`, no passphrase needed) — see [Signing keys](#signing-keys).
 
 ## Building from source
 

bcc_core.py

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ in its original position.
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import base64
 import contextlib
 import difflib
 import functools
@@ -2163,12 +2164,36 @@ def restart_claude_desktop() -> RestartResult:
 # is rejected by validate_catalog() regardless of how plausible it looks.
 CATALOG_ALLOWED_COMMANDS = frozenset({"npx", "uvx", "docker", "node", "python", "python3"})
 
+# Env var keys a catalog entry's config.env must never set. Every one of
+# these is a loader/interpreter override that lets a value walk straight
+# past CATALOG_ALLOWED_COMMANDS and the -e/--eval/-c deny-rule below: e.g.
+# NODE_OPTIONS="--require /tmp/x.js" turns an allowlisted `npx` entry into
+# arbitrary code execution without ever touching config.args, which is the
+# only field the allowlist/deny-rules/ASCII/secret checks used to cover.
+# Matched case-insensitively -- env keys are case-sensitive on POSIX, but a
+# `node_options` lookalike is exactly the kind of thing this must catch.
+CATALOG_DENIED_ENV_KEYS = frozenset(
+    {
+        "NODE_OPTIONS",
+        "PYTHONSTARTUP",
+        "PYTHONPATH",
+        "PYTHONHOME",
+        "LD_PRELOAD",
+        "LD_LIBRARY_PATH",
+        "DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES",
+        "DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH",
+        "BROWSER",
+        "PATH",
+        "NODE_REPL_EXTERNAL_MODULE",
+    }
+)
+
 # Ed25519 public keys allowed to sign a catalog, raw 32-byte form. A LIST
 # (not a single key) so keys can be rotated without bricking installs that
 # still trust an older key: verify_catalog_signature() accepts a match
 # against ANY key in this list.
 CATALOG_PUBKEYS: list[bytes] = [
-    b"\x00" * 32,  # TODO: real key from Catalog Console (#62)
+    base64.b64decode("0s24PmkZcTT5yxNDdyTPHl5fyxArrHNPJKBjnXoQd8k="),
 ]
 
 # Domain-separation prefix for the signed message. The signature covers
@@ -2188,6 +2213,36 @@ _CATALOG_SECRET_ARG_RE = re.compile(r"(?i)--api[-_]?key=|--token=|--password=")
 # <PLACEHOLDER>-style tokens the GUI must have the user fill in before Save.
 _PLACEHOLDER_RE = re.compile(r"<[^<>\s]+>")
 
+# A catalog entry's id becomes an mcpServers JSON key AND is interpolated
+# into Qt.AutoText widgets (status bar, QMessageBox) -- an id like
+# "<b>Verified</b>" renders as markup there. Not RCE, but UI spoofing, so
+# ids are constrained to a plain lowercase slug.
+_CATALOG_ID_RE = re.compile(r"^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9._-]{0,63}$")
+
+# Docker flags that consume the next arg as a value (so that value must not
+# be mistaken for the image reference when locating it in config.args).
+_DOCKER_VALUE_FLAGS = frozenset(
+    {
+        "-e",
+        "--env",
+        "-v",
+        "--volume",
+        "-p",
+        "--publish",
+        "--name",
+        "-w",
+        "--workdir",
+        "-u",
+        "--user",
+        "--entrypoint",
+        "--network",
+        "--platform",
+        "--add-host",
+        "-l",
+        "--label",
+    }
+)
+
 # How many versions a single accepted catalog jump may leap in one go. Bounds
 # a "freeze" attack: a compromised/leaked signing key claiming an absurd
 # future version would otherwise permanently outrank every legitimate
@@ -2262,6 +2317,121 @@ def _docker_arg_violations(tag: str, args: list[str]) -> list[str]:
     return problems
 
 
+def _catalog_package_spec_version(spec: str) -> str | None:
+    """
+    Extract the version pin from an npm-style package spec, or None if the
+    spec carries no pin.
+
+    Handles unscoped "name@version" and scoped "@scope/name@version" --
+    scoped names have a leading "@" that is NOT the version separator, so a
+    naive split on the first/only "@" misparses "@scope/pkg" (no version)
+    as pinned to "scope/pkg". Splitting from the right side instead is safe
+    for both forms because a package name may contain "@" only as the
+    scope's leading character.
+    """
+    if spec.startswith("@"):
+        rest = spec[1:]
+        if "@" not in rest:
+            return None
+        _, _, version = rest.rpartition("@")
+        return version or None
+    if "@" not in spec:
+        return None
+    _, _, version = spec.rpartition("@")
+    return version or None
+
+
+def _catalog_package_spec_pinned(spec: str) -> bool:
+    """
+    True if `spec` carries an exact version pin. Covers npm's "name@version"
+    / "@scope/name@version" and uv's documented PyPI pin forms
+    "name@version" and "name==version".
+    """
+    if "==" in spec:
+        _, _, version = spec.partition("==")
+        return bool(version)
+    return bool(_catalog_package_spec_version(spec))
+
+
+def _first_catalog_package_spec(args: list[str]) -> str | None:
+    """
+    The first arg that could plausibly BE a package spec: skip flags
+    (leading "-") and <PLACEHOLDER> tokens (which can't be validated and
+    are filled in by the user later, never shipped by the catalog as the
+    package name itself). Everything after the first hit is ignored --
+    trailing flags, paths, and placeholders are not package specs.
+    """
+    for a in args:
+        if a.startswith("-"):
+            continue
+        if _PLACEHOLDER_RE.fullmatch(a):
+            continue
+        return a
+    return None
+
+
+def _catalog_pin_violations(tag: str, command: str, args: list[str]) -> list[str]:
+    """
+    Version-pinning enforcement (finding #3): a catalog PR can otherwise
+    ship `npx -y @scope/pkg` or `docker run img:latest` and the *next*
+    resolve of that package/image is whatever the registry serves that day
+    -- outside review, outside the signature's meaning. This is the only
+    place that enforces pinning at runtime; catalog_review.py's
+    risk_unpinned_package() is a maintainer-facing hint, not a gate.
+    """
+    if command in ("npx", "uvx"):
+        spec = _first_catalog_package_spec(args)
+        if spec is None:
+            return [f"{tag}: config.args must include a package spec to pin (e.g. name@1.2.3)."]
+        if not _catalog_package_spec_pinned(spec):
+            return [
+                f"{tag}: config.args package {spec!r} is not version-pinned; use "
+                "name@version, @scope/name@version, or name==version."
+            ]
+        return []
+
+    if command == "docker":
+        image = _docker_image_ref(args)
+        if image is None:
+            return [f"{tag}: config.args docker command has no image reference to pin."]
+        _, sep, image_tag = image.rpartition(":")
+        if not sep or "/" in image_tag:
+            return [
+                f"{tag}: config.args docker image {image!r} has no explicit tag; "
+                "pin an exact version (not 'latest', not untagged)."
+            ]
+        if image_tag == "latest":
+            return [
+                f"{tag}: config.args docker image {image!r} uses the 'latest' tag, "
+                "which is not allowed; pin an exact version."
+            ]
+        return []
+
+    return []
+
+
+def _docker_image_ref(args: list[str]) -> str | None:
+    """
+    Locate the image reference in a `docker run ...` args list: skip the
+    "run" subcommand and any flags, including ones that consume the next
+    token as a value (-e, -v, --name, ...) so that value isn't mistaken for
+    the image. The first remaining positional token is the image.
+    """
+    i = 0
+    if i < len(args) and args[i] == "run":
+        i += 1
+    while i < len(args):
+        a = args[i]
+        if a.startswith("-"):
+            if a in _DOCKER_VALUE_FLAGS and "=" not in a:
+                i += 2
+            else:
+                i += 1
+            continue
+        return a
+    return None
+
+
 def _validate_catalog_config(tag: str, config) -> list[str]:
     """Validate the `config` block of a basic-tier catalog entry."""
     if not isinstance(config, dict):
@@ -2282,10 +2452,11 @@ def _validate_catalog_config(tag: str, config) -> list[str]:
             f"({', '.join(sorted(CATALOG_ALLOWED_COMMANDS))})."
         )
 
-    args = config.get("args")
+    raw_args = config.get("args")
-    if not isinstance(args, list) or not all(isinstance(a, str) for a in args):
+    args_ok = isinstance(raw_args, list) and all(isinstance(a, str) for a in raw_args)
+    args = raw_args if args_ok else []
+    if not args_ok:
         problems.append(f"{tag}: config.args must be a list of strings.")
-        args = []
 
     for a in args:
         if not a.isascii():
@@ -2304,11 +2475,55 @@ def _validate_catalog_config(tag: str, config) -> list[str]:
     if command == "docker":
         problems.extend(_docker_arg_violations(tag, args))
 
+    # Version pinning (finding #3) -- only meaningful once command/args are
+    # actually well-formed; a malformed args list already got its own
+    # problem above and has nothing left to pin-check.
+    if args_ok and command in ("npx", "uvx", "docker"):
+        problems.extend(_catalog_pin_violations(tag, command, args))
+
     env = config.get("env")
-    if env is not None and (
+    if env is not None:
-        not isinstance(env, dict) or any(not isinstance(v, str) for v in env.values())
+        env_ok = isinstance(env, dict) and all(
-    ):
+            isinstance(k, str) and isinstance(v, str) for k, v in env.items()
+        )
+        if not env_ok:
             problems.append(f"{tag}: config.env must be an object of string values.")
+        else:
+            # config.env (finding #2): unlike args, env was previously
+            # type-checked ONLY -- no allowlist, no deny-rule, no ASCII
+            # check, no secret check. That made it the single easiest way
+            # to smuggle a payload past every other guard in this
+            # function: an allowlisted `command: npx` plus
+            # NODE_OPTIONS=--require /tmp/x.js in env walks straight past
+            # the command allowlist AND the -e/--eval/-c deny-rule above,
+            # because neither of those ever looks at env.
+            for key, value in env.items():
+                if not key.isascii():
+                    problems.append(
+                        f"{tag}: config.env key {key!r} must be ASCII "
+                        "(non-ASCII code points rejected)."
+                    )
+                if key.upper() in CATALOG_DENIED_ENV_KEYS:
+                    problems.append(
+                        f"{tag}: config.env key {key!r} is on the catalog deny-list "
+                        "(interpreter/loader override) and is not allowed."
+                    )
+                if not value.isascii():
+                    problems.append(
+                        f"{tag}: config.env value for {key!r} must be ASCII "
+                        "(non-ASCII code points rejected)."
+                    )
+                if _is_secret_value(value):
+                    problems.append(
+                        f"{tag}: config.env[{key!r}] looks like a real secret value; "
+                        "catalog entries must never ship secret values."
+                    )
+                if value != "" and not _PLACEHOLDER_RE.fullmatch(value):
+                    problems.append(
+                        f"{tag}: config.env[{key!r}] must be an empty string or a "
+                        "single <PLACEHOLDER> token -- the catalog declares which env "
+                        "vars a server needs, it never supplies their values."
+                    )
 
     return problems
 
@@ -2328,6 +2543,12 @@ def _validate_catalog_entry(idx: int, entry, seen_ids: set[str]) -> list[str]:
         tag = f"servers[{idx}] ({entry_id!r})"
         if not entry_id.isascii():
             problems.append(f"{tag}: 'id' must be ASCII (non-ASCII code points rejected).")
+        elif not _CATALOG_ID_RE.match(entry_id):
+            problems.append(
+                f"{tag}: 'id' must match ^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9._-]{{0,63}}$ "
+                "(it becomes an mcpServers JSON key and is interpolated into "
+                "Qt.AutoText widgets)."
+            )
         if entry_id in seen_ids:
             problems.append(f"{tag}: duplicate id.")
         seen_ids.add(entry_id)
@@ -2441,15 +2662,32 @@ def verify_catalog_signature(raw: bytes, sig: bytes, pubkeys: list[bytes]) -> bo
     return False
 
 
+def _verify_catalog_candidate(candidate: tuple[bytes, bytes] | None) -> tuple[dict | None, int]:
+    """Verify+load+validate one (raw, sig) candidate. Returns (None, -1) on any failure."""
+    if not candidate:
+        return None, -1
+    raw, sig = candidate
+    if not verify_catalog_signature(raw, sig, CATALOG_PUBKEYS):
+        return None, -1
+    try:
+        data = load_catalog(raw)
+    except (ValueError, TypeError):
+        return None, -1
+    if validate_catalog(data):
+        return None, -1
+    return data, catalog_version(data)
+
+
 def resolve_catalog(
     bundled: tuple[bytes, bytes] | None,
     cached: tuple[bytes, bytes] | None,
     remote: tuple[bytes, bytes] | None,
+    floor: int = 0,
 ) -> dict:
     """
-    Pick the highest-version catalog among bundled/cached/remote. Each
+    Pick the highest-version catalog among bundled/cached/remote. Each of
-    argument is either None (unavailable) or an (raw_bytes, signature_bytes)
+    bundled/cached/remote is either None (unavailable) or an (raw_bytes,
-    pair.
+    signature_bytes) pair.
 
     🔴 SECURITY: every candidate — including `bundled`, the copy frozen into
     this binary — is verified against CATALOG_PUBKEYS and re-validated from
@@ -2460,46 +2698,68 @@ def resolve_catalog(
     by virtue of being local. Signing (and checking the signature at
     runtime, every time) closes that.
 
-    Anti-rollback: a candidate's version is never accepted if it's lower
+    `floor` is a pure, caller-supplied lower bound (e.g. a persisted
-    than the best verified candidate already found in this same resolution
+    "last accepted version" the GUI can load from disk and pass in) — this
-    pass — an attacker replaying an old, since-superseded signed catalog
+    function does no storage of its own.
-    can't downgrade you.
 
-    Anti-freeze: a candidate whose version leaps more than
+    Anti-rollback / anti-freeze, and WHY they apply to every candidate
-    _CATALOG_MAX_VERSION_JUMP past the current best is also rejected. A
+    including the first one evaluated: the previous version of this
-    compromised/leaked signing key claiming an absurd future version would
+    function only ran these checks `if best_version >= 0`, i.e. once a
-    otherwise permanently outrank every legitimate release from then on,
+    candidate had already been accepted in this pass. That let the FIRST
-    since the resolver always prefers the highest verified version — this
+    verified candidate through unconditionally — a signed catalog claiming
-    caps how far a single accepted jump can go.
+    version=999999999 sailed straight past both guards if it happened to be
+    evaluated first, and rollback protection reset on every call anyway
+    (nothing persisted across restarts). Now both guards are anchored to
+    something that doesn't depend on iteration order:
+
+    - The anti-freeze cap is measured against the BUNDLED catalog's version
+      (verified independently, once), not against "whatever was accepted
+      so far in this loop." Bundled ships inside the binary, so it's the
+      one candidate that isn't attacker-supplied at resolve time — the
+      natural trust anchor. If bundled itself doesn't verify, `floor` is
+      the anchor instead.
+    - The anti-rollback floor is max(floor, bundled's version), so a
+      caller that persists `floor` across restarts gets real rollback
+      protection; a caller that doesn't still gets "never below bundled."
+
+    On a version TIE, the bundled candidate wins over cached/remote (it
+    previously lost ties to whichever candidate happened to be evaluated
+    last, silently preferring remote over bundled at equal version).
 
     Returns the winning catalog dict, or {} if nothing verified and
     validated.
     """
+    bundled_data, bundled_version = _verify_catalog_candidate(bundled)
+
+    anchor = bundled_version if bundled_version >= 0 else floor
+    min_accepted = max(floor, bundled_version if bundled_version >= 0 else 0)
+
+    candidates = (
+        ("bundled", bundled_data, bundled_version),
+        ("cached", *_verify_catalog_candidate(cached)),
+        ("remote", *_verify_catalog_candidate(remote)),
+    )
+
     best: dict = {}
     best_version = -1
+    best_is_bundled = False
 
-    for candidate in (bundled, cached, remote):
+    for source, data, version in candidates:
-        if not candidate:
+        if data is None:
-            continue
-        raw, sig = candidate
-        if not verify_catalog_signature(raw, sig, CATALOG_PUBKEYS):
-            continue
-        try:
-            data = load_catalog(raw)
-        except (ValueError, TypeError):
-            continue
-        if validate_catalog(data):
             continue
+        if version < min_accepted:
+            continue  # anti-rollback / below the persisted floor
+        if version > anchor + _CATALOG_MAX_VERSION_JUMP:
+            continue  # anti-freeze, capped against the bundled trust anchor
 
-        version = catalog_version(data)
+        is_bundled = source == "bundled"
-        if best_version >= 0:
+        better = version > best_version or (
-            if version < best_version:
+            version == best_version and is_bundled and not best_is_bundled
-                continue  # anti-rollback
+        )
-            if version > best_version + _CATALOG_MAX_VERSION_JUMP:
+        if better:
-                continue  # anti-freeze
-
             best = data
             best_version = version
+            best_is_bundled = is_bundled
 
     return best
 

catalog_review.py

@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ new surface" recurring-bug lesson).
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import base64
+import hashlib
 import os
 import re
 from collections.abc import Callable
@@ -24,6 +26,7 @@ from urllib.parse import urlsplit
 
 from bcc_core import _CATALOG_SIG_DOMAIN as CATALOG_SIG_DOMAIN
 from bcc_core import CATALOG_ALLOWED_COMMANDS
+from bcc_core import verify_catalog_signature as _verify_catalog_signature
 
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
 # Semantic diff
@@ -432,25 +435,89 @@ def has_blocking_risk(change: EntryChange) -> bool:
 class ReviewSession:
     """State for one review pass. `pinned_blob_sha` is the git blob SHA of
     data/catalog.json as it existed the moment review began -- see
-    can_sign()."""
+    can_sign()/sign_precondition().
+
+    `loaded_ref` is the exact ref this review was loaded from ("main", or a
+    PR's `refs/pull/<n>/head`) -- see issue #68 finding 1. It exists so the
+    Sign path can re-resolve the TOCTOU blob SHA from *the ref that was
+    actually reviewed*, instead of a hardcoded "main" that silently diverges
+    from the reviewed ref on every PR review (the bug that made the PR path
+    unable to sign at all, and forced everyone onto the vacuous
+    main-vs-itself path instead).
+
+    `reattest` marks a KEY-ROTATION re-attestation pass (issue #68 finding 5
+    follow-up): the currently-trusted `bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS` key changed
+    and the existing `data/catalog.json.sig` no longer verifies under it.
+    Content-wise nothing may have changed -- `diff_catalogs(old, new)` can be
+    genuinely empty -- but the NEW key has never vouched for any of this
+    catalog before, so every entry needs a first-time attestation under the
+    new key, not a diff against the old one. When `reattest` is set,
+    `changes` is built as "every entry in `new_catalog`, presented as if
+    newly added" (via `diff_catalogs(None, new_catalog)`) instead of a
+    diff against `old_catalog`, so the acknowledge-gate in `can_sign()`
+    requires re-reviewing everything the new key will sign -- which is the
+    intended cost of a key rotation, not a bypass of the empty-diff guard.
+    """
 
     pinned_blob_sha: str
     old_catalog: dict
     new_catalog: dict
+    loaded_ref: str = "main"
+    reattest: bool = False
     changes: list[EntryChange] = field(default_factory=list)
     acknowledged: set[str] = field(default_factory=set)
 
     def __post_init__(self) -> None:
         if not self.changes:
+            if self.reattest:
+                # Every entry in the new catalog is treated as though it
+                # were newly added -- because, under the NEW signing key,
+                # it is: nothing this key signs was ever attested by it
+                # before. Reusing diff_catalogs(None, new) (rather than a
+                # bespoke code path) means the same "added" risk predicate
+                # (risk_new_entry) and the same EntryChange shape the rest
+                # of this module and the GUI already know how to render
+                # apply here unmodified.
+                self.changes = diff_catalogs(None, self.new_catalog)
+            else:
                 self.changes = diff_catalogs(self.old_catalog, self.new_catalog)
 
 
-def start_review(pinned_blob_sha: str, old_catalog: dict, new_catalog: dict) -> ReviewSession:
+def start_review(
+    pinned_blob_sha: str,
+    old_catalog: dict,
+    new_catalog: dict,
+    loaded_ref: str = "main",
+    reattest: bool = False,
+) -> ReviewSession:
     return ReviewSession(
-        pinned_blob_sha=pinned_blob_sha, old_catalog=old_catalog, new_catalog=new_catalog
+        pinned_blob_sha=pinned_blob_sha,
+        old_catalog=old_catalog,
+        new_catalog=new_catalog,
+        loaded_ref=loaded_ref,
+        reattest=reattest,
     )
 
 
+def find_last_signed_catalog_raw(
+    candidates: list[bytes], sig: bytes, pubkeys: list[bytes]
+) -> bytes | None:
+    """Given `candidates` (candidate raw catalog.json byte-strings -- e.g.
+    successive historical versions from git log, most-recent-first),
+    return the first one whose signature verifies against `sig`/`pubkeys`,
+    or None if none do.
+
+    This is how source="main" review diffs against "the last catalog a
+    maintainer actually signed" instead of against itself (issue #68
+    finding 1): `catalog_console.last_signed_catalog_raw` walks
+    data/catalog.json's git history on main and hands the candidates here.
+    """
+    for raw in candidates:
+        if _verify_catalog_signature(raw, sig, pubkeys):
+            return raw
+    return None
+
+
 def acknowledge_entry(session: ReviewSession, entry_id: str) -> None:
     ids = {c.entry_id for c in session.changes}
     if entry_id not in ids:
@@ -483,22 +550,61 @@ class SignDecision:
 def can_sign(session: ReviewSession, current_blob_sha: str) -> SignDecision:
     """Whether the Sign button may fire right now.
 
-    Two independent gates, both required:
+    Four independent gates, all required, checked in this order:
-    1. TOCTOU: `current_blob_sha` (fetched fresh, immediately before signing)
+
+    0. The diff must be non-empty. An empty diff historically meant "Sign
+       unlocks instantly" (`set() <= set()` is vacuously True), which is
+       exactly backwards: a vacuously-satisfied gate is worse than no gate
+       at all, because it *manufactures confidence* -- the signature looks
+       identical to one produced by a real review. "Nothing changed" must
+       mean "nothing to sign", never "sign unlocked". (Issue #68 finding 1;
+       this is what let commit b08cf21 sign all 19 entries with zero of them
+       ever reviewed.)
+
+       This gate is unaffected by `session.reattest`: a key-rotation
+       re-attestation session's `changes` is built from
+       `diff_catalogs(None, new_catalog)` (see ReviewSession), which is
+       empty ONLY if the catalog itself has zero entries -- a genuinely
+       empty catalog either way. Rotation never manufactures a non-empty
+       changeset out of an empty one; it just changes *what* "non-empty"
+       is computed against.
+    1. TOCTOU: `current_blob_sha` (fetched fresh, immediately before signing,
+       from the ref that was actually reviewed -- see sign_precondition())
        must match the blob SHA pinned when review began. If the bytes on the
        remote changed since -- a new commit pushed to the same PR, a
        force-push, another PR merged in between -- signing is refused and a
        re-review is forced. This is what makes "signing is the approval act"
        true rather than aspirational: the signature is bound to the exact
        reviewed bytes, not to "whatever the file happens to be now".
-    2. Every changed entry in the diff must be individually acknowledged.
+    2. No blocking risk finding may be outstanding on ANY changed entry, full
+       stop -- checked here, not just in the GUI. The GUI additionally
+       disables the acknowledge checkbox for a blocking entry, but that is a
+       UI nicety, not the enforcement point: if this pure gate didn't also
+       check it, a blocking risk would only be stopped by the GUI happening
+       to have wired the checkbox correctly, and nothing would catch a
+       regression in that wiring. The GUI must not be the only thing
+       standing between a blocking risk and a signature.
+    3. Every changed entry in the diff must be individually acknowledged.
     """
+    if not session.changes:
+        return SignDecision(
+            False,
+            "Nothing to sign: this review's diff is empty. If you expected "
+            "changes here, you may be diffing the wrong source/ref.",
+        )
     if current_blob_sha != session.pinned_blob_sha:
         return SignDecision(
             False,
             "The reviewed bytes changed since this review began (blob SHA "
             "mismatch) -- re-review required before signing.",
         )
+    blocking_ids = sorted({c.entry_id for c in session.changes if has_blocking_risk(c)})
+    if blocking_ids:
+        return SignDecision(
+            False,
+            "Blocking risk finding(s) outstanding on: "
+            f"{', '.join(blocking_ids)} -- fix the underlying change, do not sign around it.",
+        )
     if not all_entries_acknowledged(session):
         pending = sorted({c.entry_id for c in session.changes} - session.acknowledged)
         return SignDecision(
@@ -507,6 +613,28 @@ def can_sign(session: ReviewSession, current_blob_sha: str) -> SignDecision:
     return SignDecision(True, None)
 
 
+def sign_precondition(
+    session: ReviewSession, resolve_blob_sha: Callable[[str], str]
+) -> SignDecision:
+    """The real Sign-button gate: resolves the current TOCTOU blob SHA from
+    *the ref this session was actually loaded from* (`session.loaded_ref`),
+    never a hardcoded "main", then delegates to can_sign().
+
+    `resolve_blob_sha` is injected so this stays testable without git/Qt --
+    catalog_console.ReviewWindow._on_sign passes a real resolver
+    (fetch_ref + blob_sha_at against self.repo_dir); tests pass a fake
+    dict-backed lookup. This is the fix for issue #68 finding 1's first bug:
+    `_on_sign` used to hardcode `fetch_ref(self.repo_dir, "main")` as the
+    comparison ref, so for any PR review (where `loaded_ref` is the PR's
+    head, not main) the SHAs differed by definition and Sign could never
+    fire -- and the retry path re-called the same hardcoded resolver, so it
+    re-pinned the same wrong value and looped forever instead of forcing a
+    genuine re-review.
+    """
+    current_blob_sha = resolve_blob_sha(session.loaded_ref)
+    return can_sign(session, current_blob_sha)
+
+
 def catalog_signing_message(raw_bytes: bytes) -> bytes:
     """The exact bytes that get signed: bcc_core's domain-separation prefix
     (imported, never retyped) + the raw catalog bytes. Using this function
@@ -725,3 +853,243 @@ _NON_ASCII_RE = re.compile(r"[^\x00-\x7f]")
 
 def contains_non_ascii(s: str) -> bool:
     return bool(_NON_ASCII_RE.search(s))
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# Key status reporting (issue #62/#68 follow-up: "make key handling
+# comprehensible"). Pure functions only -- `catalog_console.py cmd_keys` is a
+# thin printer that gathers inputs (local key caches, source-file text, the
+# catalog + its .sig) and hands them here. NEVER touches private key bytes:
+# every input/output here is a public key, a fingerprint, or a status string.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+
+
+def fingerprint_pubkey(pubkey: bytes) -> str:
+    """Short, human-comparable fingerprint of a raw Ed25519 public key: the
+    first 16 hex chars of its SHA-256 digest, grouped in 4s (e.g. "3F2A 9C1B
+    44DE 08AA") so two fingerprints can be eyeballed for a mismatch the way a
+    PGP fingerprint is. Deliberately NOT the raw base64 pubkey itself in the
+    default short form (that's available via the full committed value in the
+    report) -- a fixed-width grouped hex string is easier to compare at a
+    glance and to read aloud/type over chat if needed. Never derived from,
+    and never printed alongside, any private key material.
+    """
+    digest = hashlib.sha256(pubkey).hexdigest().upper()[:16]
+    return " ".join(digest[i : i + 4] for i in range(0, len(digest), 4))
+
+
+_PUBKEY_LIST_B64_RE = re.compile(r'base64\.b64decode\(\s*"([^"]+)"\s*\)')
+
+
+def extract_pubkey_list_literal(source_text: str, var_name: str) -> list[bytes]:
+    """Best-effort extraction of a `<var_name>: list[bytes] = [...]` literal
+    (each entry a `base64.b64decode("...")` call, matching the exact style
+    bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS and scripts.sign_checksums.RELEASE_PUBKEYS are
+    both written in) straight out of Python source TEXT.
+
+    Deliberately a regex over text, not an import: `catalog_console.py keys`
+    must report on whatever ref/branch is checked out at the inspected repo
+    path, which may not be (and need not be) importable from the running
+    process's own sys.path. Returns [] if the variable isn't found in this
+    exact shape -- callers treat that as "nothing committed here", not an
+    error, since a report that can't parse a file should say so plainly
+    rather than crash the whole `keys` command over one malformed file.
+    """
+    match = re.search(
+        rf"{re.escape(var_name)}\s*:\s*list\[bytes\]\s*=\s*\[(.*?)\]", source_text, re.DOTALL
+    )
+    if not match:
+        return []
+    keys: list[bytes] = []
+    for b64 in _PUBKEY_LIST_B64_RE.findall(match.group(1)):
+        try:
+            keys.append(base64.b64decode(b64))
+        except ValueError:
+            continue
+    return keys
+
+
+_CI_TRUST_ANCHOR_RE = re.compile(r'EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64:\s*"([^"]+)"')
+
+
+def extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey(ci_yml_text: str) -> bytes | None:
+    """Best-effort extraction of ci.yml's `EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64` trust
+    anchor (issue #68 finding 4) from the workflow file's TEXT. Returns None
+    if the constant isn't found -- the `keys` report shows that plainly
+    ("not found in ci.yml") rather than raising.
+    """
+    match = _CI_TRUST_ANCHOR_RE.search(ci_yml_text)
+    if not match:
+        return None
+    try:
+        return base64.b64decode(match.group(1))
+    except ValueError:
+        return None
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class PubkeyLocationCheck:
+    """One place in the source tree a key's public half is expected to be
+    committed, and whether the fingerprint(s) found there match the key
+    stored locally."""
+
+    location: str
+    committed_fingerprints: tuple[str, ...]
+    status: str  # "match" | "mismatch" | "unknown" (no local key to compare against)
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class KeyStatus:
+    """Everything `catalog_console.py keys` reports about ONE signing key.
+    Built by key_status() below; rendered by render_key_status_report().
+    Never carries private key material -- every field here is safe to print.
+    """
+
+    kind: str  # "catalog" | "release"
+    display_name: str  # "CATALOG" | "RELEASE"
+    purpose: str  # one-line plain-English purpose
+    private_key_location: str  # human-readable, e.g. "on this machine, in the OS keychain"
+    local_exists: bool
+    local_fingerprint: str | None
+    locations: tuple[PubkeyLocationCheck, ...]
+    catalog_sig_status: str | None = None  # "valid" | "invalid" | "missing" | None (n/a)
+
+
+def key_status(
+    kind: str,
+    *,
+    display_name: str,
+    purpose: str,
+    private_key_location: str,
+    local_exists: bool,
+    local_pubkey: bytes | None,
+    locations: list[tuple[str, list[bytes]]],
+    catalog_sig_status: str | None = None,
+) -> KeyStatus:
+    """Pure assembly of a KeyStatus from already-resolved inputs (no file or
+    git I/O here -- that's catalog_console.py's job). `locations` is a list
+    of (label, committed_pubkeys) pairs, e.g.
+    [("bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [...]), ("ci.yml trust anchor", [...])],
+    so a key can be checked against every place its public half is expected
+    to be committed, independently -- this is the check that would have
+    caught bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS and ci.yml's trust anchor silently
+    drifting apart (issue #68 finding 4 was exactly that kind of drift).
+    """
+    checks: list[PubkeyLocationCheck] = []
+    for label, committed_pubkeys in locations:
+        fps = tuple(fingerprint_pubkey(pk) for pk in committed_pubkeys)
+        if local_pubkey is None:
+            status = "unknown"
+        elif local_pubkey in committed_pubkeys:
+            status = "match"
+        else:
+            status = "mismatch"
+        checks.append(
+            PubkeyLocationCheck(location=label, committed_fingerprints=fps, status=status)
+        )
+
+    return KeyStatus(
+        kind=kind,
+        display_name=display_name,
+        purpose=purpose,
+        private_key_location=private_key_location,
+        local_exists=local_exists,
+        local_fingerprint=fingerprint_pubkey(local_pubkey) if local_pubkey is not None else None,
+        locations=tuple(checks),
+        catalog_sig_status=catalog_sig_status,
+    )
+
+
+_LOCATION_STATUS_ICON = {"match": "✅", "mismatch": "❌", "unknown": "⚠️"}
+_LOCATION_STATUS_VERDICT = {
+    "match": "MATCHES the local private key",
+    "mismatch": "DOES NOT MATCH the local private key",
+    "unknown": "cannot compare -- no local key to check against",
+}
+_CATALOG_SIG_STATUS_LINE = {
+    "valid": "✅ data/catalog.json.sig verifies under the committed CATALOG_PUBKEYS.",
+    "invalid": (
+        "❌ data/catalog.json.sig does NOT verify under the committed CATALOG_PUBKEYS -- "
+        "the catalog needs re-signing (Load → acknowledge all → Sign)."
+    ),
+    "missing": (
+        "⚠️ data/catalog.json.sig is missing entirely -- the catalog has never been signed."
+    ),
+}
+
+
+def recommend_next_steps(statuses: list[KeyStatus]) -> list[str]:
+    """The pure "what to do next" logic behind the keys report's closing
+    section -- one concrete, runnable-looking instruction per problem found,
+    naming the exact key involved (never just "the key"). Returns a single
+    reassuring line if nothing needs attention."""
+    steps: list[str] = []
+    for s in statuses:
+        if not s.local_exists:
+            flag = " --release" if s.kind == "release" else ""
+            steps.append(
+                f"{s.display_name} key has never been generated on this machine -- run "
+                f"`python catalog_console.py keygen{flag}`."
+            )
+            continue
+        for loc in s.locations:
+            if loc.status == "mismatch":
+                steps.append(
+                    f"{s.display_name} key's local fingerprint does not match "
+                    f"{loc.location} -- update {loc.location} to the fingerprint shown "
+                    "above (or, if this is unexpected, treat the committed key as "
+                    "untrusted and investigate before doing anything else)."
+                )
+            elif loc.status == "unknown":
+                steps.append(
+                    f"{s.display_name} key's local fingerprint could not be checked against "
+                    f"{loc.location} -- re-run keygen (or, for an older install, unlock the "
+                    "key once) so its public half is cached locally."
+                )
+        if s.kind == "catalog" and s.catalog_sig_status in ("invalid", "missing"):
+            steps.append(
+                "The catalog needs re-signing: run `python catalog_console.py gui --repo .` "
+                "and Load → acknowledge every entry → Sign. If main is red because "
+                "of a key rotation, load the branch with the rotation instead of main "
+                "(current-branch / --ref source) so the fix lands before merge."
+            )
+    if not steps:
+        steps.append("Everything is consistent -- no action needed.")
+    return steps
+
+
+def render_key_status_report(statuses: list[KeyStatus]) -> str:
+    """Render a full, plain-English-first key status report as one string.
+    `catalog_console.py cmd_keys` prints this verbatim -- the CLI is a thin
+    printer over this pure function, which is what makes the report's
+    content (not just its plumbing) unit-testable."""
+    lines: list[str] = []
+    for s in statuses:
+        lines.append(f"=== {s.display_name} KEY ===")
+        lines.append(s.purpose)
+        lines.append(f"Private half lives: {s.private_key_location}")
+        if s.local_exists and s.local_fingerprint:
+            lines.append(f"Exists locally: yes (fingerprint {s.local_fingerprint})")
+        elif s.local_exists:
+            lines.append("Exists locally: yes (fingerprint unknown -- re-run keygen to cache it)")
+        else:
+            lines.append("Exists locally: no")
+        for loc in s.locations:
+            icon = _LOCATION_STATUS_ICON.get(loc.status, "?")
+            fps = (
+                ", ".join(loc.committed_fingerprints)
+                if loc.committed_fingerprints
+                else "(nothing committed here)"
+            )
+            verdict = _LOCATION_STATUS_VERDICT.get(loc.status, loc.status)
+            lines.append(f"  {icon} {loc.location}: {fps} -- {verdict}")
+        if s.catalog_sig_status is not None:
+            lines.append(
+                f"Catalog signature: {_CATALOG_SIG_STATUS_LINE.get(s.catalog_sig_status, s.catalog_sig_status)}"
+            )
+        lines.append("")
+
+    lines.append("What to do next:")
+    for step in recommend_next_steps(statuses):
+        lines.append(f"  - {step}")
+    return "\n".join(lines)

data/catalog.json.sig

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+ы<8¶ђt2ішл„»‰/НЕ0Тjcw&`
+тrH«MўК›єrBL,0AS€!Х2–иже.SТ°ч–'Agm

scripts/sign_checksums.py

@@ -42,6 +42,29 @@ from pathlib import Path
 # message signed by the same key.
 DOMAIN_PREFIX = b"bcc-release-v1|"
 
+# Public half of the RELEASE signing key(s) -- a SEPARATE keypair from
+# bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS (issue #68 finding 5). The catalog key is the
+# offline, Console-only root of trust for what BCC executes; this key is
+# CI-resident and signs ONLY the release SHA256SUMS manifest, never the
+# catalog. Keeping them apart means a CI/repo-secret compromise burns the
+# release key -- annoying, but it never lets an attacker sign a catalog a
+# user's binary would trust. A LIST (not a single key), mirroring
+# CATALOG_PUBKEYS, so the release key can be rotated without invalidating
+# the signature on every past release: verification accepts a match against
+# ANY key here.
+#
+# Populated by the maintainer via:
+#     python catalog_console.py keygen --release
+# Rotated 2026-07 (issue #68 finding 5 / #68 CI-exposure incident): the
+# original key was shared with the catalog key and had been exposed to CI,
+# so both keypairs were regenerated as separate, disjoint keys. This list
+# holds only the current release key -- if release.yml's signing-smoke-test
+# ever sees this list empty, it fails closed (loudly) rather than silently
+# verifying against nothing.
+RELEASE_PUBKEYS: list[bytes] = [
+    base64.b64decode("6BnPgJEHJFyVltFoLTCNadIsehjy00iiW8IRlC1TfhA="),
+]
+
 CHUNK_SIZE = 1024 * 1024
 
 
@@ -135,6 +158,19 @@ def public_key_b64_from_seed(seed_b64: str) -> str:
     return base64.b64encode(raw).decode("ascii")
 
 
+def verify_checksums_against_any(pubkeys: list[bytes], sums_text: str, signature: bytes) -> bool:
+    """Verify `signature` against ANY key in `pubkeys` (each a raw 32-byte
+    Ed25519 public key). Mirrors bcc_core.verify_catalog_signature's
+    rotation-friendly "any currently-trusted key" semantics, applied to
+    RELEASE_PUBKEYS instead of the catalog's key list. Returns False (never
+    raises) for an empty `pubkeys` list -- fails closed rather than
+    vacuously verifying against nothing."""
+    return any(
+        verify_checksums(base64.b64encode(pk).decode("ascii"), sums_text, signature)
+        for pk in pubkeys
+    )
+
+
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
 # CLI
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #

tests/test_catalog_console_git.py

@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+"""Tests for catalog_console.py's non-Qt git plumbing and ref-resolution
+seam (issue #68 rotation-completability fix).
+
+catalog_console.py is importable here WITHOUT PySide6 -- its Qt import is
+guarded (`_PYSIDE6_AVAILABLE`) precisely so `keygen`, `show-seed-b64`,
+`keys`, and this git plumbing stay usable (and testable) wherever PySide6
+isn't installed, including this CI test job, which never installs it. If
+PySide6 genuinely isn't importable in this environment, that itself
+exercises the guard path -- see test_module_imports_without_pyside6.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import subprocess
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+import catalog_console as cc
+import catalog_review as review
+
+_SEED_CATALOG = b'{"schema": 1, "version": 1, "servers": []}'
+_SEED_SIG = b"\x00" * 64
+
+
+def _run(*args: str, cwd: Path) -> None:
+    subprocess.run(["git", *args], cwd=cwd, check=True, capture_output=True)
+
+
+def _init_bare_and_clone(tmp_path: Path) -> tuple[Path, Path]:
+    """A bare "origin" repo with `main` and `rotation-branch` both seeded
+    with a catalog + (dummy) signature, plus a working clone with `origin`
+    already configured -- mirroring the tokened-remote clone
+    catalog_console.py's git plumbing is always run against."""
+    origin = tmp_path / "origin.git"
+    _run("init", "--bare", str(origin), cwd=tmp_path)
+
+    seed = tmp_path / "seed"
+    _run("clone", str(origin), str(seed), cwd=tmp_path)
+    _run("config", "user.email", "test@example.com", cwd=seed)
+    _run("config", "user.name", "Test", cwd=seed)
+
+    (seed / "data").mkdir()
+    (seed / "data" / "catalog.json").write_bytes(_SEED_CATALOG)
+    (seed / "data" / "catalog.json.sig").write_bytes(_SEED_SIG)
+    _run("add", "-A", cwd=seed)
+    _run("commit", "-m", "seed", cwd=seed)
+    _run("push", "origin", "HEAD:refs/heads/main", cwd=seed)
+    _run("checkout", "-b", "rotation-branch", cwd=seed)
+    _run("push", "origin", "HEAD:refs/heads/rotation-branch", cwd=seed)
+
+    clone = tmp_path / "work"
+    _run("clone", str(origin), str(clone), cwd=tmp_path)
+    _run("config", "user.email", "test@example.com", cwd=clone)
+    _run("config", "user.name", "Test", cwd=clone)
+    return origin, clone
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# The module must stay importable without PySide6 -- this IS the fix that
+# lets `keys`/`keygen`/`show-seed-b64` (and this whole test file) run
+# somewhere PySide6 isn't installed.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_module_imports_without_pyside6():
+    assert hasattr(cc, "_PYSIDE6_AVAILABLE")
+    # This CI test job never installs PySide6 (see .github/workflows/ci.yml
+    # "Install test dependencies": pytest + cryptography only) -- so on CI,
+    # this assertion is itself proof the guard is doing its job. Locally,
+    # where a maintainer's env DOES have PySide6, it's fine either way; the
+    # only real assertion this test needs is "importing the module never
+    # raises", which happened just by getting this far.
+    assert cc._PYSIDE6_AVAILABLE in (True, False)
+
+
+def test_cmd_gui_fails_soft_without_pyside6(monkeypatch, capsys):
+    if cc._PYSIDE6_AVAILABLE:
+        return  # nothing to prove where PySide6 IS available
+    import argparse
+
+    args = argparse.Namespace(repo=".", ref=None)
+    assert cc.cmd_gui(args) == 1
+    assert "PySide6" in capsys.readouterr().err
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# compute_own_refs: the PURE ref-resolution seam. No git, no Qt.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_compute_own_refs_defaults_to_main_only():
+    assert cc.compute_own_refs(None, None) == ["main"]
+
+
+def test_compute_own_refs_adds_detected_branch():
+    assert cc.compute_own_refs(None, "chore/68-key-rotation") == [
+        "main",
+        "chore/68-key-rotation",
+    ]
+
+
+def test_compute_own_refs_explicit_ref_overrides_detected_branch():
+    assert cc.compute_own_refs("explicit-branch", "detected-branch") == [
+        "main",
+        "explicit-branch",
+    ]
+
+
+def test_compute_own_refs_does_not_duplicate_main():
+    assert cc.compute_own_refs(None, "main") == ["main"]
+    assert cc.compute_own_refs("main", "some-other-branch") == ["main"]
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# current_branch: git plumbing, no Qt.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_current_branch_detects_checked_out_branch(tmp_path):
+    _origin, clone = _init_bare_and_clone(tmp_path)
+    _run("fetch", "origin", "rotation-branch", cwd=clone)
+    _run("checkout", "-B", "rotation-branch", "origin/rotation-branch", cwd=clone)
+    assert cc.current_branch(clone) == "rotation-branch"
+
+
+def test_current_branch_none_on_detached_head(tmp_path):
+    _origin, clone = _init_bare_and_clone(tmp_path)
+    commit = cc.fetch_ref(clone, "main")
+    _run("checkout", commit, cwd=clone)
+    assert cc.current_branch(clone) is None
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# commit_and_push_signed_catalog: MUST target the given branch, never a
+# hardcoded "main" -- issue #68's completability fix. This is exactly the
+# bug that, before the fix, would have made ReviewWindow._on_sign push a
+# PR/branch review's signature straight to main regardless of what was
+# actually reviewed.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_commit_and_push_signed_catalog_targets_the_given_branch_not_main(tmp_path):
+    _origin, clone = _init_bare_and_clone(tmp_path)
+
+    new_raw = b'{"schema": 1, "version": 2, "servers": []}'
+    new_sig = b"\x01" * 64
+    cc.commit_and_push_signed_catalog(clone, new_raw, new_sig, branch="rotation-branch")
+
+    rotation_commit = cc.fetch_ref(clone, "rotation-branch")
+    rotation_raw, _sha = cc.read_catalog_at_commit(clone, rotation_commit)
+    assert rotation_raw == new_raw
+
+    # main on the shared origin must be COMPLETELY untouched by a sign that
+    # was reviewed and pushed against rotation-branch.
+    main_commit = cc.fetch_ref(clone, "main")
+    main_raw, _sha = cc.read_catalog_at_commit(clone, main_commit)
+    assert main_raw == _SEED_CATALOG
+
+
+def test_commit_and_push_signed_catalog_still_defaults_to_main(tmp_path):
+    """Backward-compatible default: callers that don't pass `branch` (there
+    are none left in catalog_console.py itself, but the signature keeps the
+    default for any other caller / test fixture) still push to main."""
+    _origin, clone = _init_bare_and_clone(tmp_path)
+
+    new_raw = b'{"schema": 1, "version": 2, "servers": []}'
+    new_sig = b"\x01" * 64
+    cc.commit_and_push_signed_catalog(clone, new_raw, new_sig)
+
+    main_commit = cc.fetch_ref(clone, "main")
+    main_raw, _sha = cc.read_catalog_at_commit(clone, main_commit)
+    assert main_raw == new_raw
+
+    rotation_commit = cc.fetch_ref(clone, "rotation-branch")
+    rotation_raw, _sha = cc.read_catalog_at_commit(clone, rotation_commit)
+    assert rotation_raw == _SEED_CATALOG  # untouched
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# catalog_sig_status_on_disk: the check behind `keys`' "does catalog.json.sig
+# currently verify?" line -- this is precisely the check that would have
+# caught the current chore/68-key-rotation state (bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS
+# rotated, data/catalog.json.sig still signed by the retired key).
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_catalog_sig_status_on_disk_valid(tmp_path):
+    seed, pub = review.generate_keypair()
+    raw = b'{"schema": 1, "version": 1, "servers": []}'
+    sig = review.sign_catalog_bytes(raw, seed)
+
+    (tmp_path / "data").mkdir()
+    (tmp_path / "data" / "catalog.json").write_bytes(raw)
+    (tmp_path / "data" / "catalog.json.sig").write_bytes(sig)
+
+    assert cc.catalog_sig_status_on_disk(tmp_path, [pub]) == "valid"
+
+
+def test_catalog_sig_status_on_disk_invalid_when_pubkey_rotated(tmp_path):
+    """The exact chore/68-key-rotation scenario: signed by an OLD key, but
+    the committed pubkey list now only has the NEW key."""
+    old_seed, _old_pub = review.generate_keypair()
+    _new_seed, new_pub = review.generate_keypair()
+    raw = b'{"schema": 1, "version": 1, "servers": []}'
+    sig = review.sign_catalog_bytes(raw, old_seed)
+
+    (tmp_path / "data").mkdir()
+    (tmp_path / "data" / "catalog.json").write_bytes(raw)
+    (tmp_path / "data" / "catalog.json.sig").write_bytes(sig)
+
+    assert cc.catalog_sig_status_on_disk(tmp_path, [new_pub]) == "invalid"
+
+
+def test_catalog_sig_status_on_disk_missing_when_no_sig_file(tmp_path):
+    (tmp_path / "data").mkdir()
+    (tmp_path / "data" / "catalog.json").write_bytes(b"{}")
+    assert cc.catalog_sig_status_on_disk(tmp_path, []) == "missing"
+
+
+def test_catalog_sig_status_on_disk_missing_when_no_catalog_file(tmp_path):
+    (tmp_path / "data").mkdir()
+    (tmp_path / "data" / "catalog.json.sig").write_bytes(b"\x00" * 64)
+    assert cc.catalog_sig_status_on_disk(tmp_path, []) == "missing"

tests/test_catalog_review.py

@@ -334,13 +334,29 @@ def test_acknowledge_gating_requires_every_entry():
     assert r.all_entries_acknowledged(session) is True
 
 
-def test_no_acknowledge_all_function_exists():
+def test_no_acknowledge_all_shortcut_and_gate_is_real():
-    """Deliberate: there must be no shortcut to acknowledge every entry at
+    """Two things, both load-bearing (issue #68: the original version of
-    once. See the comment in catalog_review.py above SignDecision."""
+    this test asserted ONLY the first half, and passed the entire time the
+    gate below it was vacuously satisfiable -- 'no function named
+    acknowledge_all' is worthless if signing doesn't actually require
+    acknowledgement in practice).
+
+    1. No bulk-acknowledge shortcut exists (see the comment in
+       catalog_review.py above SignDecision -- deliberate friction).
+    2. The gate that friction protects is actually enforced: with entries
+       still unacknowledged, can_sign() must refuse, not just "some GUI
+       checkbox happens to be unticked".
+    """
     names = [n for n in dir(r) if "acknowledge" in n.lower()]
     assert "acknowledge_all" not in names
     assert "acknowledge_all_entries" not in names
 
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", _catalog(), _catalog(_entry(id="a"), _entry(id="b")))
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "a")  # only one of two -- not a bulk call
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "acknowledged" in decision.reason.lower()
+
 
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
 # can_sign: TOCTOU blob pinning + acknowledge gating combined
@@ -377,6 +393,222 @@ def test_can_sign_blob_mismatch_takes_priority_message():
     assert "blob" in decision.reason.lower() or "changed" in decision.reason.lower()
 
 
+def test_can_sign_false_on_empty_changeset():
+    """The exact bug behind issue #68 finding 1: 'main' loaded against
+    itself diffs to [], and an empty changeset used to leave can_sign()
+    with nothing to refuse on (set() <= set() is vacuously True). Commit
+    b08cf21 signed 19 entries through precisely this path -- zero of them
+    were ever reviewed. An empty diff must mean 'nothing to sign', never
+    'sign unlocked'."""
+    same_catalog = _catalog(_entry())
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", same_catalog, same_catalog)
+    assert session.changes == []  # diff_catalogs(x, x) -> []
+    assert r.all_entries_acknowledged(session) is True  # vacuously -- this is the trap
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")  # blob matches, "everything" acknowledged
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "nothing to sign" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+
+def test_can_sign_false_with_outstanding_blocking_risk_even_if_acknowledged():
+    """can_sign() must itself refuse a blocking risk finding -- today a
+    blocking finding only disables the GUI checkbox, so the pure gate must
+    not simply trust that the caller never acknowledged a blocking entry.
+    Acknowledge it directly here (bypassing any GUI checkbox-disable logic
+    entirely) to prove the gate catches it independently of the GUI."""
+    session = r.start_review(
+        "sha1",
+        _catalog(),
+        _catalog(_entry(config={"command": "bash", "args": ["-c", "evil"]})),
+    )
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "filesystem")
+    assert r.all_entries_acknowledged(session) is True
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "blocking" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# sign_precondition: the ref-resolution seam that used to hardcode "main"
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_sign_precondition_resolves_against_loaded_ref_not_hardcoded_main():
+    """The regression test for issue #68 finding 1's first bug:
+    ReviewWindow._on_sign used to hardcode fetch_ref(repo, "main") as the
+    TOCTOU comparison ref. For a PR review, _on_load pins the PR HEAD's
+    blob SHA, so comparing against main's SHA differs by definition and
+    Sign could never fire on the PR path.
+
+    The fake resolver below returns a DIFFERENT (deliberately wrong) SHA for
+    "main" than for the PR ref that was actually loaded. If
+    sign_precondition ever resolves against "main" instead of
+    session.loaded_ref, this test fails -- both via the recorded `calls`
+    list and via decision.ok flipping to False.
+    """
+    pr_ref = "refs/pull/42/head"
+    session = r.start_review("pr-blob-sha", _catalog(), _catalog(_entry()), loaded_ref=pr_ref)
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "filesystem")
+
+    calls: list[str] = []
+
+    def fake_resolver(ref: str) -> str:
+        calls.append(ref)
+        return {"main": "main-blob-sha-WRONG", pr_ref: "pr-blob-sha"}[ref]
+
+    decision = r.sign_precondition(session, fake_resolver)
+    assert calls == [pr_ref]  # never asked the resolver for "main"
+    assert decision.ok is True
+    assert decision.reason is None
+
+
+def test_sign_precondition_refuses_when_loaded_ref_blob_moved():
+    """Same seam, the negative case: if the loaded ref's blob SHA has moved
+    since review began (a new commit landed on the reviewed PR/branch), the
+    resolver reflects that and sign_precondition must refuse -- proving this
+    isn't just a hardcoded pass-through."""
+    pr_ref = "refs/pull/42/head"
+    session = r.start_review("pr-blob-sha", _catalog(), _catalog(_entry()), loaded_ref=pr_ref)
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "filesystem")
+
+    def fake_resolver(_ref: str) -> str:
+        return "pr-blob-sha-AFTER-A-NEW-PUSH"
+
+    decision = r.sign_precondition(session, fake_resolver)
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "mismatch" in decision.reason.lower() or "changed" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+
+def test_sign_precondition_defaults_to_main_when_loaded_ref_unset():
+    """start_review()'s loaded_ref defaults to 'main' for source=main
+    reviews (and backward-compat with callers that don't pass it)."""
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", _catalog(), _catalog(_entry()))
+    assert session.loaded_ref == "main"
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "filesystem")
+
+    def fake_resolver(ref: str) -> str:
+        assert ref == "main"
+        return "sha1"
+
+    decision = r.sign_precondition(session, fake_resolver)
+    assert decision.ok is True
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# ReviewSession(reattest=True): key-rotation re-attestation (issue #68
+# finding 5 follow-up). After rotating bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS, the
+# existing data/catalog.json.sig no longer verifies under the new key even
+# though catalog CONTENT is unchanged -- diff_catalogs(old, new) would be
+# empty, and an empty changeset must never unlock Sign (can_sign gate 0).
+# Re-attestation mode sidesteps that correctly: instead of diffing against
+# the (now-untrustworthy) last-signed content, it treats every entry as
+# requiring a fresh acknowledgement, exactly like a brand-new catalog.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_reattest_mode_with_unchanged_content_yields_one_change_per_entry():
+    same = _catalog(_entry(id="a"), _entry(id="b"), _entry(id="c"))
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", same, same, reattest=True)
+    assert len(session.changes) == 3
+    assert {c_.entry_id for c_ in session.changes} == {"a", "b", "c"}
+    # Presented "as if newly added" -- old_catalog plays no role here.
+    assert all(c_.status == "added" for c_ in session.changes)
+    assert all(c_.old is None for c_ in session.changes)
+
+
+def test_reattest_mode_can_sign_refuses_until_all_acknowledged_then_permits():
+    same = _catalog(_entry(id="a"), _entry(id="b"), _entry(id="c"))
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", same, same, reattest=True)
+
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "acknowledged" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "a")
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "b")
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is False  # "c" still outstanding
+    assert "acknowledged" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "c")
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is True
+    assert decision.reason is None
+
+
+def test_normal_mode_with_unchanged_content_still_refuses_empty_diff():
+    """The rotation path must NOT become a general bypass of the empty-diff
+    guard: reattest=False (the default) against identical old/new catalogs
+    must behave exactly as before -- can_sign refuses with 'nothing to
+    sign', full stop."""
+    same = _catalog(_entry(id="a"), _entry(id="b"))
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", same, same)  # reattest defaults False
+    assert session.changes == []
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "nothing to sign" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+
+def test_reattest_mode_still_enforces_blocking_risk_check():
+    """Re-attestation must not relax the blocking-risk gate: a
+    disallowed-command entry blocks Sign even with every entry
+    acknowledged."""
+    cat = _catalog(
+        _entry(id="a"),
+        _entry(id="evil", config={"command": "bash", "args": ["-c", "rm -rf /"]}),
+    )
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", cat, cat, reattest=True)
+    assert len(session.changes) == 2
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "a")
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "evil")
+    assert r.all_entries_acknowledged(session) is True
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "blocking" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+
+def test_reattest_mode_still_enforces_toctou_pin():
+    """Re-attestation must not relax the TOCTOU blob-SHA pin: acknowledging
+    everything is not enough if the bytes moved underneath the review."""
+    same = _catalog(_entry(id="a"))
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", same, same, reattest=True)
+    r.acknowledge_entry(session, "a")
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha1")
+    assert decision.ok is True  # sanity: matches when blob is unchanged
+
+    decision = r.can_sign(session, "sha2-a-new-commit-landed")
+    assert decision.ok is False
+    assert "mismatch" in decision.reason.lower() or "changed" in decision.reason.lower()
+
+
+def test_reattest_defaults_to_false():
+    """start_review()'s reattest parameter defaults to False -- normal
+    (diff-based) review is the default behaviour, never silently entered."""
+    session = r.start_review("sha1", _catalog(), _catalog(_entry()))
+    assert session.reattest is False
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# find_last_signed_catalog_raw: what source=main diffs against
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_find_last_signed_catalog_raw_returns_matching_candidate():
+    """Simulates walking catalog.json's git history: the CURRENT signature
+    covers an OLDER version of the bytes (a later commit changed
+    catalog.json without re-signing -- the exact bypass that produced
+    commit b08cf21). The first candidate that verifies against that
+    signature is 'the last catalog a maintainer actually signed'."""
+    seed, pubkey = r.generate_keypair()
+    old_raw = b'{"schema":1,"version":1,"servers":[]}'
+    new_raw = b'{"schema":1,"version":2,"servers":[]}'
+    sig = r.sign_catalog_bytes(old_raw, seed)  # signature covers the OLD bytes
+    found = r.find_last_signed_catalog_raw([new_raw, old_raw], sig, [pubkey])
+    assert found == old_raw
+
+
+def test_find_last_signed_catalog_raw_none_when_nothing_verifies():
+    seed, _pubkey = r.generate_keypair()
+    _other_seed, other_pubkey = r.generate_keypair()
+    raw = b'{"schema":1,"version":1,"servers":[]}'
+    sig = r.sign_catalog_bytes(raw, seed)
+    # Check against a pubkey list that does NOT include the signer's key.
+    assert r.find_last_signed_catalog_raw([raw], sig, [other_pubkey]) is None
+
+
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
 # catalog_signing_message: domain separation must match bcc_core exactly
 # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
@@ -553,3 +785,245 @@ def test_contains_non_ascii_true():
 
 def test_contains_non_ascii_false():
     assert r.contains_non_ascii("package") is False
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# fingerprint_pubkey
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_fingerprint_pubkey_is_deterministic():
+    pub = b"\x01" * 32
+    assert r.fingerprint_pubkey(pub) == r.fingerprint_pubkey(pub)
+
+
+def test_fingerprint_pubkey_differs_for_different_keys():
+    assert r.fingerprint_pubkey(b"\x01" * 32) != r.fingerprint_pubkey(b"\x02" * 32)
+
+
+def test_fingerprint_pubkey_never_contains_the_key_bytes_themselves():
+    pub = b"\x42" * 32
+    fp = r.fingerprint_pubkey(pub)
+    assert pub.hex() not in fp.lower().replace(" ", "")
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# extract_pubkey_list_literal / extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey: text parsing
+# for `catalog_console.py keys`, exercised here with no file I/O.
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def test_extract_pubkey_list_literal_single_key():
+    _seed, pub = r.generate_keypair()
+    import base64
+
+    text = (
+        "CATALOG_PUBKEYS: list[bytes] = [\n"
+        f'    base64.b64decode("{base64.b64encode(pub).decode()}"),\n'
+        "]\n"
+    )
+    assert r.extract_pubkey_list_literal(text, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS") == [pub]
+
+
+def test_extract_pubkey_list_literal_multiple_keys():
+    import base64
+
+    pubs = [r.generate_keypair()[1] for _ in range(2)]
+    body = ",\n".join(f'    base64.b64decode("{base64.b64encode(p).decode()}")' for p in pubs)
+    text = f"RELEASE_PUBKEYS: list[bytes] = [\n{body},\n]\n"
+    assert r.extract_pubkey_list_literal(text, "RELEASE_PUBKEYS") == pubs
+
+
+def test_extract_pubkey_list_literal_missing_variable_returns_empty():
+    assert r.extract_pubkey_list_literal("some unrelated text", "CATALOG_PUBKEYS") == []
+
+
+def test_extract_pubkey_list_literal_does_not_match_a_different_variable():
+    import base64
+
+    _seed, pub = r.generate_keypair()
+    text = f'OTHER_PUBKEYS: list[bytes] = [base64.b64decode("{base64.b64encode(pub).decode()}")]\n'
+    assert r.extract_pubkey_list_literal(text, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS") == []
+
+
+def test_extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey_found():
+    import base64
+
+    _seed, pub = r.generate_keypair()
+    text = f'          EXPECTED_CATALOG_PUBKEY_B64: "{base64.b64encode(pub).decode()}"\n'
+    assert r.extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey(text) == pub
+
+
+def test_extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey_missing_returns_none():
+    assert r.extract_ci_trust_anchor_pubkey("no anchor here") is None
+
+
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+# key_status / render_key_status_report / recommend_next_steps
+# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
+def _kw(**overrides):
+    base = dict(
+        kind="catalog",
+        display_name="CATALOG",
+        purpose="Signs the catalog.",
+        private_key_location="on this machine",
+        local_exists=True,
+        local_pubkey=b"\x01" * 32,
+        locations=[("bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [b"\x01" * 32])],
+        catalog_sig_status="valid",
+    )
+    base.update(overrides)
+    return base
+
+
+def test_key_status_reports_match_when_local_pubkey_in_committed_list():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw())
+    assert status.locations[0].status == "match"
+
+
+def test_key_status_reports_mismatch_when_local_pubkey_not_in_committed_list():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(locations=[("bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [b"\x02" * 32])]))
+    assert status.locations[0].status == "mismatch"
+
+
+def test_key_status_reports_unknown_when_no_local_pubkey():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(local_pubkey=None, local_exists=False))
+    assert status.locations[0].status == "unknown"
+    assert status.local_fingerprint is None
+
+
+def test_key_status_never_carries_a_local_fingerprint_when_key_absent():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(local_pubkey=None, local_exists=False))
+    assert status.local_exists is False
+    assert status.local_fingerprint is None
+
+
+def test_key_status_fingerprint_matches_fingerprint_pubkey_helper():
+    pub = b"\x03" * 32
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(local_pubkey=pub, locations=[("x", [pub])]))
+    assert status.local_fingerprint == r.fingerprint_pubkey(pub)
+
+
+def test_key_status_checks_multiple_locations_independently():
+    """A key can match one committed location and mismatch another -- this
+    is exactly the drift issue #68 finding 4 was about (bcc_core.py and
+    ci.yml silently disagreeing on the trust anchor)."""
+    pub = b"\x04" * 32
+    other = b"\x05" * 32
+    status = r.key_status(
+        **_kw(
+            local_pubkey=pub,
+            locations=[
+                ("bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [pub]),
+                ("ci.yml trust anchor", [other]),
+            ],
+        )
+    )
+    assert status.locations[0].status == "match"
+    assert status.locations[1].status == "mismatch"
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_flags_never_generated_key():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(local_exists=False, local_pubkey=None, locations=[]))
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert any("keygen" in s and "CATALOG" in s for s in steps)
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_release_key_uses_release_flag():
+    status = r.key_status(
+        kind="release",
+        display_name="RELEASE",
+        purpose="Signs checksums.",
+        private_key_location="not generated yet",
+        local_exists=False,
+        local_pubkey=None,
+        locations=[],
+    )
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert any("keygen --release" in s for s in steps)
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_flags_mismatch_by_location_name():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(locations=[("bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [b"\x99" * 32])]))
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert any("bcc_core.CATALOG_PUBKEYS" in s and "CATALOG" in s for s in steps)
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_flags_invalid_catalog_signature():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(catalog_sig_status="invalid"))
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert any("re-signing" in s for s in steps)
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_flags_missing_catalog_signature():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw(catalog_sig_status="missing"))
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert any("re-signing" in s for s in steps)
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_all_clear_when_nothing_wrong():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw())
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert steps == ["Everything is consistent -- no action needed."]
+
+
+def test_recommend_next_steps_release_key_has_no_catalog_signature_advice():
+    """A mismatched RELEASE key must never trigger catalog-signing advice --
+    the two keys' remediation paths must not bleed into each other."""
+    status = r.key_status(
+        kind="release",
+        display_name="RELEASE",
+        purpose="Signs checksums.",
+        private_key_location="on this machine",
+        local_exists=True,
+        local_pubkey=b"\x06" * 32,
+        locations=[("scripts/sign_checksums.py RELEASE_PUBKEYS", [b"\x07" * 32])],
+        catalog_sig_status=None,
+    )
+    steps = r.recommend_next_steps([status])
+    assert not any("re-signing" in s for s in steps)
+    assert any("RELEASE" in s for s in steps)
+
+
+def test_render_key_status_report_never_prints_private_key_material():
+    """The report string must be built ONLY from public inputs. Sanity
+    check: no field on KeyStatus/PubkeyLocationCheck is capable of holding
+    private key bytes in the first place (there's no such field to leak),
+    and the render function only touches fields that exist -- this test
+    guards against a future field addition reintroducing that risk."""
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw())
+    text = r.render_key_status_report([status])
+    assert "CATALOG" in text
+    assert (
+        "purpose" not in text.lower() or "Signs the catalog." in text
+    )  # sanity, not a real secret
+    # No 64-hex-char (or longer) run anywhere -- a raw 32-byte seed/sig
+    # would show up as one if it were ever accidentally interpolated in.
+    import re as _re
+
+    assert not _re.search(r"[0-9a-fA-F]{64,}", text)
+
+
+def test_render_key_status_report_names_the_specific_key_not_generic_the_key():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw())
+    text = r.render_key_status_report([status])
+    assert "CATALOG KEY" in text
+    assert "the key" not in text.lower()
+
+
+def test_render_key_status_report_includes_catalog_signature_line_only_for_catalog():
+    catalog_status = r.key_status(**_kw())
+    release_status = r.key_status(
+        kind="release",
+        display_name="RELEASE",
+        purpose="Signs checksums.",
+        private_key_location="on this machine",
+        local_exists=True,
+        local_pubkey=b"\x08" * 32,
+        locations=[("scripts/sign_checksums.py RELEASE_PUBKEYS", [b"\x08" * 32])],
+        catalog_sig_status=None,
+    )
+    text = r.render_key_status_report([catalog_status, release_status])
+    assert text.count("Catalog signature:") == 1
+
+
+def test_render_key_status_report_ends_with_what_to_do_next_section():
+    status = r.key_status(**_kw())
+    text = r.render_key_status_report([status])
+    assert "What to do next:" in text

tests/test_core.py

@@ -1690,8 +1690,12 @@ def _minimal_catalog(version: int = 1) -> dict:
                 "official": True,
                 "setup": "basic",
                 "config": {
+                    # Pinned on purpose (issue #68 finding 3): an earlier
+                    # version of this fixture used an unpinned package and
+                    # asserted it validated clean, which enshrined the bug
+                    # instead of catching it.
                     "command": "npx",
-                    "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp"],
+                    "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
                 },
                 "placeholders": {},
                 "env_required": {},
@@ -1952,6 +1956,213 @@ def test_validate_catalog_rejects_duplicate_ids():
     assert any("duplicate id" in p for p in problems)
 
 
+# --- validate_catalog: config.env (issue #68 finding 2) -------------------- #
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_each_denied_env_key():
+    for key in sorted(c.CATALOG_DENIED_ENV_KEYS):
+        data = _catalog_with(
+            {"config": {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"], "env": {key: ""}}}
+        )
+        problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+        assert any("deny-list" in p for p in problems), (key, problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_denied_env_key_case_insensitively():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"node_options": ""},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("deny-list" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_nonempty_nonplaceholder_env_value():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"FOO_URL": "https://example.com"},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("empty string or a single <PLACEHOLDER>" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_accepts_empty_and_placeholder_env_values():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"FOO": "", "BAR_URL": "<BAR_URL>"},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_non_ascii_env_key():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"FÖO": ""},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("config.env key" in p and "ASCII" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_non_ascii_env_value():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"FOO": "<Bäd>"},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("config.env value" in p and "ASCII" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_secret_looking_env_value():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"SOME_TOKEN": "ghp_abcdef1234567890"},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("real secret value" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_node_options_env_walking_past_allowlist():
+    # The exact reproduction from issue #68 finding 2: an allowlisted
+    # `npx` command carrying NODE_OPTIONS in env, which previously passed
+    # validation and would have flowed straight into the executed
+    # subprocess via catalog_entry_to_paste_json().
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "npx",
+                "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"],
+                "env": {"NODE_OPTIONS": "--require /tmp/payload.js"},
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert problems != []
+
+
+# --- validate_catalog: version pinning (issue #68 finding 3) --------------- #
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_unpinned_npx_package():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp"]}})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("not version-pinned" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_unpinned_scoped_npx_package():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@scope/pkg"]}})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("not version-pinned" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_accepts_pinned_scoped_npx_package():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@scope/pkg@1.2.3"]}})
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_unpinned_uvx_package():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "uvx", "args": ["some-tool"]}})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("not version-pinned" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_accepts_uvx_at_version_pin():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "uvx", "args": ["some-tool@1.0.0"]}})
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_accepts_uvx_double_equals_pin():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "uvx", "args": ["some-tool==1.0.0"]}})
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_docker_latest_tag():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "docker", "args": ["run", "some/image:latest"]}})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("'latest'" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_docker_untagged_image():
+    data = _catalog_with({"config": {"command": "docker", "args": ["run", "some/image"]}})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("no explicit tag" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_accepts_pinned_docker_image_with_flags():
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "docker",
+                "args": ["run", "-i", "--rm", "-e", "SOME_TOKEN", "some/image:1.2.3"],
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_does_not_pin_check_placeholders_flags_or_subcommand():
+    # A pinned uvx spec followed by flags and a <PLACEHOLDER> positional
+    # must not itself get mistaken for an unpinned package.
+    data = _catalog_with(
+        {
+            "config": {
+                "command": "uvx",
+                "args": ["mcp-server-git@2026.7.10", "--repository", "<REPO_PATH>"],
+            }
+        }
+    )
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
+# --- validate_catalog: id constraint (issue #68 finding 7) ----------------- #
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_id_with_markup():
+    data = _catalog_with({"id": "<b>Verified</b>"})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("must match" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_id_with_uppercase():
+    data = _catalog_with({"id": "Widget"})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("must match" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_rejects_id_starting_with_dash():
+    data = _catalog_with({"id": "-widget"})
+    problems = c.validate_catalog(data)
+    assert any("must match" in p for p in problems)
+
+
+def test_validate_catalog_accepts_valid_slug_id():
+    data = _catalog_with({"id": "widget-2.thing-ok"})
+    assert c.validate_catalog(data) == []
+
+
 # --- resolve_catalog -------------------------------------------------------- #
 def test_resolve_catalog_nothing_available_returns_empty_dict():
     assert c.resolve_catalog(None, None, None) == {}
@@ -2003,13 +2214,93 @@ def test_resolve_catalog_rejects_absurd_version_jump(monkeypatch):
     pub = priv.public_key().public_bytes_raw()
     monkeypatch.setattr(c, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [pub])
 
-    cached = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=5), priv)
+    # The freeze attempt goes FIRST (as `cached`), the legitimate catalog
+    # SECOND (as `remote`) -- on purpose. Putting the good catalog first
+    # (as an earlier version of this test did) never exercises the
+    # vulnerable path: the old implementation only guarded a candidate
+    # against "the best accepted so far," so whichever candidate was
+    # evaluated FIRST got in unconditionally, uncapped. Ordering the freeze
+    # attempt first is what actually proves the cap holds regardless of
+    # evaluation order.
     freeze_attempt = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=999999), priv)
+    good = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=5), priv)
 
-    result = c.resolve_catalog(None, cached, freeze_attempt)
+    result = c.resolve_catalog(None, freeze_attempt, good)
     assert c.catalog_version(result) == 5
 
 
+def test_resolve_catalog_caps_first_and_only_candidate(monkeypatch):
+    # issue #68 finding 6: with no bundled catalog to anchor against, a
+    # signed catalog claiming an absurd version must still be capped even
+    # when it is the ONLY candidate resolve_catalog() ever sees -- there is
+    # no "best so far" for it to be compared against, so the cap has to
+    # apply unconditionally, not "once something else has already landed."
+    priv = Ed25519PrivateKey.generate()
+    pub = priv.public_key().public_bytes_raw()
+    monkeypatch.setattr(c, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [pub])
+
+    freeze_attempt = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=999999999), priv)
+
+    result = c.resolve_catalog(None, None, freeze_attempt)
+    assert result == {}
+
+
+def test_resolve_catalog_anchors_cap_to_bundled_not_a_chained_best(monkeypatch):
+    # Anti-freeze must be measured against the BUNDLED version specifically,
+    # not against "whatever the best-so-far happens to be after each
+    # candidate is accepted" -- a chained anchor lets each accepted
+    # candidate ratchet the allowed ceiling upward, so a legitimate
+    # moderate bump (cached) plus a second, much larger jump (remote) can
+    # each individually look "within _CATALOG_MAX_VERSION_JUMP of the
+    # previous one" while remote is nowhere near bundled's version.
+    priv = Ed25519PrivateKey.generate()
+    pub = priv.public_key().public_bytes_raw()
+    monkeypatch.setattr(c, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [pub])
+
+    bundled = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=2), priv)
+    cached = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=1000), priv)  # within 1000 of bundled
+    remote = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=1900), priv)  # within 1000 of cached,
+    #                                                          NOT of bundled
+
+    result = c.resolve_catalog(bundled, cached, remote)
+    assert c.catalog_version(result) == 1000
+
+
+def test_resolve_catalog_prefers_bundled_on_version_tie(monkeypatch):
+    # issue #68 finding 6: on a tie the LAST candidate evaluated used to
+    # win, so remote silently beat bundled at equal version. Bundled --
+    # the copy frozen into the binary -- must win ties.
+    priv = Ed25519PrivateKey.generate()
+    pub = priv.public_key().public_bytes_raw()
+    monkeypatch.setattr(c, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [pub])
+
+    bundled_data = _minimal_catalog(version=5)
+    bundled = _signed(bundled_data, priv)
+
+    remote_data = _minimal_catalog(version=5)
+    remote_data["servers"][0]["display"] = "Remote Impostor"
+    remote = _signed(remote_data, priv)
+
+    result = c.resolve_catalog(bundled, None, remote)
+    assert c.catalog_version(result) == 5
+    assert result["servers"][0]["display"] == "Widget"
+
+
+def test_resolve_catalog_floor_rejects_below_persisted_version(monkeypatch):
+    # `floor` is a pure parameter: the caller (eventually the GUI, from
+    # persisted storage) can pass a previously-accepted version, and
+    # nothing below it may be accepted even with no bundled catalog to
+    # anchor against.
+    priv = Ed25519PrivateKey.generate()
+    pub = priv.public_key().public_bytes_raw()
+    monkeypatch.setattr(c, "CATALOG_PUBKEYS", [pub])
+
+    stale = _signed(_minimal_catalog(version=3), priv)
+
+    result = c.resolve_catalog(None, None, stale, floor=10)
+    assert result == {}
+
+
 def test_resolve_catalog_malformed_candidate_does_not_raise(monkeypatch):
     priv = Ed25519PrivateKey.generate()
     pub = priv.public_key().public_bytes_raw()
@@ -2039,15 +2330,32 @@ def test_resolve_catalog_invalid_but_signed_candidate_is_skipped(monkeypatch):
 def test_catalog_entry_to_paste_json_basic_shape():
     entry = _minimal_catalog()["servers"][0]
     result = c.catalog_entry_to_paste_json(entry)
-    assert result == {"widget": {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp"]}}
+    assert result == {"widget": {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "widget-mcp@1.0.0"]}}
 
 
 def test_catalog_entry_to_paste_json_includes_env_when_present():
+    # NOTE: catalog_entry_to_paste_json() is a pure shape-converter for an
+    # entry that has ALREADY passed validate_catalog() -- it is correct for
+    # it to carry env through verbatim. The bug (issue #68 finding 2) was
+    # never in this function; it was that validate_catalog() let entries
+    # with dangerous/non-placeholder env values reach this function in the
+    # first place. This test now proves that boundary explicitly: a
+    # validation-legal env value (a <PLACEHOLDER> token) survives the
+    # conversion, and a value validate_catalog() would have rejected is
+    # confirmed rejected before it ever gets here.
     entry = _minimal_catalog()["servers"][0]
     entry["config"]["env"] = {"GRAFANA_URL": "<GRAFANA_URL>"}
     result = c.catalog_entry_to_paste_json(entry)
     assert result["widget"]["env"] == {"GRAFANA_URL": "<GRAFANA_URL>"}
 
+    catalog = _minimal_catalog()
+    catalog["servers"][0]["config"]["env"] = {"GRAFANA_URL": "<GRAFANA_URL>"}
+    assert c.validate_catalog(catalog) == []
+
+    malicious = _minimal_catalog()
+    malicious["servers"][0]["config"]["env"] = {"NODE_OPTIONS": "--require /tmp/payload.js"}
+    assert c.validate_catalog(malicious) != []
+
 
 def test_config_has_unfilled_placeholders_true_for_token():
     cfg = {"command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "server", "<ALLOWED_DIR>"]}